Profile of CreativeName

Can you actually read the fucking post please? I am in full agreement that invisible demos are OP, I don't know how many times I have to say it. Jesus Christ

you compared old (invisible) demos with teller or am i wrong?

USF doesnt need a rework like this imo, just nerf the broken stuff: pak howi/scott/Wc51/recon support air drop.

I would like to see the free officer locked behind their mech upgrade but thats about it.

There is no UK doctrine that has both the designate command vehicle and the Churchill Crocodile.

Tac support?

I am completing the picture you draw. Since its very easy to make a deceptive argument with half the information. Its very cool and dandy to say "salvage is OP" when you picture it like its all advantages when its not, its another option, its a feature.

Other factions have those so called features but even when discussed they are not on the focus of a debate. Do weapon racks receive such attention? Do 6 man TW aswell? What about vehicles crews? The game has assimetry and all this unique features become OP when compared to *VOID. Thats my point and you have not addressed it but evaded it.

i dont know how i evaded a point you never made until now...i never said slavage is op but it simply IS all upside, same with every other factional unique abilities/features which you can discuss as well if you want to. all i would like to see is a small tweak to the ability.

There is also a down side from a squad salvaging on front lines because they can be insta wiped by mortars or small arms fire.

well then dont salvage on the frontline, nobody forces you to do so... a-move it like every other facton. theres a huge difference between 1v1 and 4v4 in this case, theres alot less indirect in 1v1 which pretty much deletes the downside cause when you get shot while salvaging you can simply stop the process. its not really a downside when you can avoid it by paying attention

Team weapons often receive damage while being crewed, therefore when decrewed they only need a single shot. A attacking is safer because it poses no loses to deny/capture the so called TW

TW are also target of mines or ambush HMGs. A attacking from far is simply the brainded counter to this.

If a TW is really on a contested frontline its impossible to retrieve/scavenge. A smoke to enable a volk squad to do so is also a smoke to break through, it means also a squad less that will fight. Any sightblocker is useful to reposition active TW. Its not a balance issue, its a player tactical skill issue.

i dont know why you quote everything i said when you pretty much ignore everything.
most players dont bother with it but some actually repair their tw. As i said, a-attacking is usually safer but there are alot of scenarios where you just cant do that.
just the simple example of a mg dying as it leaves a house, you cant always get your at guns in a safe position to destroy it
yes, you cant salvage stuff on a contested frontline but on a less contested flank you can, plus your at guns probably wont be on the flank to deny the tw as soon as you decrew it

I dont really get the comparison between a-attacking tw and salvaging, okw can choose the appropriate option, other factions cant. all i did was listing advantages from salvaging which i dont think you can deny

The chance of Sherman firing at AT gun at range 20 and missing 3 times in a row is 1.5% (and 5.3 vs RW).

rw= raketenwerfer?
i dont know how long it takes for a sherman/t34/cromwell to fire 2-3 shots, i guess its somewhat the same as the 11sec salvage. salvaging is still more reliable since theres a 0% chance of failure.
and im pretty sure these numbers are in a vacuum, in practice the shots colide with the terrain/cover etc.