Profile of YRon²y

Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2018, 04:57 AMFelixTHM

Yeah whatever dude. Your head is so far up your own ass that even if the IS2 had the exact same stats as the Tiger you would scream "buff IS2". Nvm that until the recent patch, the Tiger was slower than the IS2. But if IS2 became similar to the Tiger you would cry about the IS2 having weaker armour (like the Tiger). The Tiger also has a significantly smaller one-hit-kill AOE radius, which is why it has much better scatter. Yeah, but logic doesn't work on you.

Basically you want an unfairly overpowered Tiger with the same cost but much better armour and a larger instant-kill aoe.



Fixes that would be reasonable: revamping the IS2 commanders to be more useable

Fixes that you want: Making the IS2 grossly overpowered and the best tank in the game by an overwhelming margin.

Jump back to quoted post7 Aug 2018, 16:10 PMFelixTHM

You're the one bs-ing, dude. I've already demonstrated countless times that the IS2 has a lot of strengths. Removing its only weakness would make it overpowered, unless you nerf the strengths as well. What you're asking for is basically a 375 armour Tiger. You keep insisting on making it a perfect, no-weakness unit because you can't understand simple English.

In fact, you may be too stupid to read but I've pointed out many times that the IS2 itself is already very good. The "problem" is that it's in Commanders that are either bad or have no infantry presence, which is why it's difficult to win with an IS2 alone - again, something that you're expecting it to do.

Jump back to quoted post7 Aug 2018, 06:06 AMFelixTHM

Well 1v1 players would point out that balancing the game for 4v4, the most boring mode of the game, is wrong.

Just because you aren't good enough to play 1v1 doesn't mean that you can invalidate balance arguments made by other players.

I don't understand why people think that tanks should be perfect and weakness-free. If you give the IS2 good offensive ability it would be overpowered.