Profile of Widerstreit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1392

General Information
Register Time: 10 Jun 2016, 09:20 AM
Last Visit Time: 3 Mar 2024, 13:02 PM


Thread: General bugs & issues collection25 Mar 2020, 23:58 PM Please fix the british grenade abilities for this patch!!! They doesn't get the range nerf if suppressed. As I remember normal miles-bombs and commando-grenade arn't effected by suppression! In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Winter balance mod 2020 V1.325 Mar 2020, 23:28 PM Please fix the british grenade abilities for this patch!!! They doesn't get the range nerf if suppressed. As I remember normal miles-bombs and commando-grenade arn't effected by suppression! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Feuersturm doctrine25 Mar 2020, 17:36 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2020, 17:06 PMT.R. Stormjäger ... Learn to quote. In: Lobby
Thread: Feuersturm doctrine25 Mar 2020, 16:34 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2020, 13:23 PMLady Xenarra What you propose would effectively kill the OKW as a faction early game. (No MG until after teching, remember?) Besides, you kinda got your wish for MP40 like SPs....just a meaner close-range version of the StG44. Pios are already very easily beaten by almost any basic allied infantry squad 1v1, discounting the upgrades. Only if you let them shoot you can they do much. Maybe RE/Combat Engineers lose to them....maybe, and even that requires some bad play. Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2020, 13:25 PMT.R. Stormjäger Allied fanboy wants axis nerfs lmao Lord, let rain brain... I am talking about blue-prints... there will be no change. xD In: Lobby
Thread: Feuersturm doctrine25 Mar 2020, 13:20 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2020, 13:14 PMLady Xenarra ... I know, but then Assault-Pios should have MG40 then. OKW - Assault-Pios: change STG with MP40 - Volks: let them like they are now (only let MP40-upgrade make then a new unit, e.g. like Grens with 5men) OST: - Pio: change MP40 with Lugar P09 Pistol - weapon-crews: change MP40 with OKW-crew-weapon K98 - Storm-troupes: change MP40 with PPSH (german used them on mass, even build a 9mm version) So the blueprints fit the DPS again. ....... Give Volks also a normal grenade and lock it like Obersoldaten (FlaK-truck) In: Lobby
Thread: Feuersturm doctrine25 Mar 2020, 13:04 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2020, 10:07 AMAerohank This would leave stock OKW with very bad early game anti-garrison options - especially if you want to go mechanized instead of medtruck as an opening. Why not give them both again, like in an older game version? Also, MP40 instead STG44 as normal weaponwould be more logical, like Vipper said. Beside, at the moment the hole weapon-profiles became confusing. ....... etc. Beside, the flame-nade is useless, even versus garrisons. xD In: Lobby
Thread: ISU-152 HE shell range should be reduced?24 Mar 2020, 11:39 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2020, 00:31 AMGrumpy ...and with this we should be done here, nothing left but pointless name calling.... PS - I just lost a 2v2 because my teammate went ISU and the other team didn't listen to you geniuses that consider the ISU uncounterable. Infernoshat put a Panther in front of it, started hitting it with two paks, pushed it back to the edge of our base, and wiped my teammates entire infantry with a skill plane while killing the ISU. I really wish he would've just dropped when he saw the mighty ISU. l2p issue In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-152 HE shell range should be reduced?23 Mar 2020, 23:05 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2020, 22:56 PMachpawel I know it all too well. It is just funny how some people can be so vocal about making sure that tigers become cats, but keep saying that 70 range monster is just fine. There are many justified changes, but when all the arguments become to be hypocritical then I simply get salty. And this thread is a perfect example for such fan-boy balancing shit, not interrested in game-balance. Edit: And if Tiger/IS/Pershing were too good, than the ISU is it too. Even more. Don't forget KV2. Simply add handy-caps, maybe that is enought: - ISU has too much side-armor + speed to allow that good weapon-stas. - KV shoulnd't be able to rotate the turret over 30° if not stationary. Simply give them handy-caps like so many other units have. Worse speed, side-armor, acc., diffrente range for abilies. etc. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-152 HE shell range should be reduced?23 Mar 2020, 23:02 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2020, 22:55 PMSkysTheLimit Right.... so you don't have an argument. The ISU was also nerfed years ago, around the same time as some of those elefant nerfs. Feel free to read about it Gut buffed again, didn't lost abilities and is now a cancer-unit. Every unit should come in with handy-caps and should be able to counterd by stock-units, in a realistic aspect. And ISU is one of these things, in comaprison with commander and line-up, simply too much. With actual weapon stats it is a. too fast b. has too much side-armor. Even with with a nerf af that the HE range it too much. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-152 HE shell range should be reduced?23 Mar 2020, 22:50 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2020, 22:45 PMSkysTheLimit You didn't even make an argument? Youre just ranting about your opinions of other people Ideas of others I prefer become part of my opinon, that is how betterment works. And incompetence has to be criticized, my primary task. ISU is OP because of same arguments Elefant's cone-sight was removed years ago, why Brummbär got sight AND armor nerf. Maybe even same why every unit got nefed. Use your brain, maybe you find the argument, because there is no need to write or say it. It is logical. In: COH2 Balance