Sturmtiger, beside the other changes this would bring it back into buissnes as a usefull unit:
- Set the reload-ability to 60-80 munition cost.
- Set range to max. 70 (old 40) and min 25. (old 15)
- Remove Vet1 ability.
You get an usefull artillery-verhicle, expensive in use and defenseless in close-combat.
|
One option for Sturmtiger is also, to make it a mobile B-4 with less range. So you get a long-range artillery. |
i don't get why Stug E has been buffed even more.
That it got buff is strange, I don't get it why M8A1 Howitzer don't get nerfed instead. Too fast shell, to much accuracy and kill-potential. Better give it same weapon as leIG18 to differentiate bouth, the M8A1 Howitzer and M1 75mm Pack Howitzer.
The thing with M42 its not "just" useless. It overlaps with ZiS and is inferior to it if you go T2. It also overlaps with PTRS Penals if you go T1 and is inferior to them when they are reinforced by Field HQ
I would still like to see it renamed as 3,7-cm-PaK 36 as a speacial unit for Ostheer. The gunes looked nearly the same and would fit better in Ostheer.
|
Revert t-34/76 back to t3 with 80f and give 85 to t4 and we can all be happy.
But T34/76 gun has to be changed, because it has too much AI ability in comparison. But yes, I thought the same. Also the option for non-doc Panzer IV with short barrel would be cool, with an upgrade for long one. Change-able.
|
Tactical Imouto: T34/85 could also become non-doc, have no probs with that, but Pershing? Easy8 would be better. |
There were more ppsh than STGs yet both Axis factions have STGs as a stock weapon for a stock unit and ppsh are all doctrinal. There were more t34/85s than.... Well most bloody tanks yet centaurs and ostwinds find themselves stock with very few of them made. Tiger is a damn fine tank and having it stock would upset the balance that barley exists now. Especially if you inexplicably make it a limit of 2 for what ever reason....
And again, didn't read the hole thing, or understod it. But, the point with the stocks makes also clear that it is even more sad that Tiger is limitated.
The Tiger would be an other unit than now, limited to two e. g. to prevent spaming. |
ferwiner: For me Tiger would become more like the Panther now, maybe with an extra ability. I would like to see Tiger be the main tank-destroyer of Ostheer, not Panther. Simply to bring the blue-print in line with the presents of King-Tiger. (E.g. if Panther would become a Tiger for Ostheer, there would be simple more Tiger than Kings, for me that seems more logical).
Supplement:
At 1943 Tigers were more present at Ostfront than Panthers, even in Zitadelle the numbers were nearly the same.
So for me Panther would be the perfect replacement for Tiger in old Tiger-Commanders, like M10 for Jackson.
EDIT: Like Comets, I want Tiger be as present as blue-print. The game is like it is, but if there are diriving phantasy verhicle like Pershing, Comets or Land Mattress (all were more rare than Tigers in war) I want to see the the beauty more often. Even as Tank-Destroyer, because there is enough AI stuff.
Tiger is rare in 3vs3+, because other Units are better (with other blue-prints ^^) and even Panther rare because StuG is better, also after the nerf. |
dOPEnEWhAIRCUT: No, it is simple, you can't read, because you are missing the topic again.
For me the fraction are looking too similar (many people say that too). And I say LOOKING, can even a native-Speaker can't understand simple adjectives?
I have many ideas i even posted and you are writing something I dindn't addressed.
|
Depending on the crap you are writing SupremeStefan it seems you can't read correctly. Same for dOPEnEWhAIRCUT.
Is it so difficult to read the hole post?
I even wrote it depends on the blue-prind.
EDIT: Tiger was a battle-tank, same as Panther. It would simply look better if there wouldn't be more King-Tiger than normal Tigers, that was the message. Even because the Tiger was mainly produced to be used at Ostfront. (Same as King-Tiger, it was also made for the Ostfront).
Even if Tiger lose all its AI (Maybe gets an ability for a explosive shells, used like Comets smoke) the Tiger would fit good, as tank-hunter.
EDIT: Even removing Panther from Ostheer would be ok.
|
@dOPEnEWhAIRCUT: How I said, for me it simply Looks stupid if OKW can build a King an Panthers. It would look better if Ostheer would be able to use Tigers instead of Panthers, for me the blueprint matters. It would also be ok if the Tiger becomes a tank-hunter and Ostheer Panther becomes the allrounder. (simply change the blueprint).
- Even a Tiger Ace would be more logical if Tiger becomes stock.
@ferwiner: Where is it more similar? |