Profile of Spinflight

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 680

General Information


Thread: Sturmpioneers - Uberpioneers25 Mar 2016, 16:08 PM "Commandos cost 350 mp btw and have invisibility as well as nuke grenades. Also they casually beat any other Infantry at any vet or with any upgrade in the game. " No, they cost 440 or 500 from a Glider. They cost 350 if you have already spent 540 on ALO / FLG Just tested them against Vet 2 Sturms at close range. Lost 2 out of 3 times. #casuallyBooksDomineIntoElementarySchool In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sturmpioneers - Uberpioneers25 Mar 2016, 15:28 PM https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LOYMDi_XR7rILsk6HbAZqGihsk22t-45C_6NbQEP-m0/edit#gid=0 Almost as strong as Commandos at Vet0, considerably better at range, get better Vet, are T1 and cost 140MP less or are free, less popcap and considerably less to reinforce. Maybe UKF should start with a squad of Commandos... Can you even imagine the whining and whingeing if this was the case? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: "Vickers is Hopeless For countering blobs" DISCUSS25 Mar 2016, 14:45 PM "Grenades are supposed to be a counter to support team anyway" If UKF had equivalent grenades then it might be a fair counter. IS would need a very long throw range to plant one anywhere near an MG42 though. OKWs support weapons are unlikely to be threatened by any grenades, ISG seems to be able to run away as fast as you can chase ( 4 dudes with Stens can't run faster than 4 dudes carrying a 400Kg team weapon?) and the rak can camo itself. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sturmpioneers - Uberpioneers25 Mar 2016, 01:59 AM "I'm not saying ONLY build SP. I just think the ratio of SP to volks works better with 2-3 sturms and 1-2 volks rather than 1 sturm and 4 volks. Granted, I also favour lots of light vehicle play and lots of mines while most people seem to prefer lots of panzerschrecks and assault grenades." I certainly find this the hardest to play against, did a comparison on one of the threads to get some idea of the manpower efficiency of the different units and Sturms were ridiculous at close range and surprisingly decent at mid. I rather suspect if I'd included Vet in the calculation then Sturms would have walked it against all other infantry types rather than merely standing out as an outlier. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Emplacement meta...25 Mar 2016, 01:52 AM Can't load it. "Replay file may be invalid..." I seem to have quite a few problems with downloaded replays, maybe 1 in 3 works and I have -allowIncompatibleReplays in my launch options... Excellent name though! And excellent chat... "[00:18:53] Mugen: ffuuuuckkk [00:19:13] Mugen: turtle bitch [00:19:45] Mugen: hey turtle bitch you there [00:24:16] Mugen: turtle bitch [00:24:20] Mugen: with sniper [00:24:23] Mugen: great [00:24:40] Mugen: learn to play turtle nitch [00:24:43] Mugen: bitch" Maybe suggesting you were afk whilst your emplacements wrecked him would have produced a rage quit here? Along the lines of, "Sorry was making a cup of tea. Where did all your Volks squads go?" Lol. In: UKF Strategies
Thread: coh2 dps chart24 Mar 2016, 21:19 PM So comparing the efficiency of mainline infantry and builders at Vet 0 and 25m... I've used 20 minutes for T1 and 15 minutes for T2. Assumed 5 reinforcements of 2 models each. 4 minutes total combat. These are purely arbitrary. OKW: Sturms: 592 damage * 4 / 780 \| 480 = 3.03\| 4.93 Volks. 582 damage * 5 / 640MP = 4.54 Ost: Pio. 172 damage * 4 / 570MP \| 370MP = 1.2 \| 1.84 Gren: 720 damage * 4/ 645MP = 4.44 USF: RE. 350 damage * 4/ 550MP \| 350MP = 2.52\| 4.0 Rifles. 562 damage * 5/ 700MP = 4.0 Sov: Eng: 307 damage * 4 / 482MP \| 312 = 2.56\| 3.92 Cons. 420 damage * 6 / 560 = 4.5 UKF: RE. 115 damage * 4/ 562MP = 1.2 IS. 796 damage * 4/ 700 \| 420 = 4.52 \| 7.56 Cover 835 damage * 4/ 700 \| 420 = 4.76 \| 7.92 Close combat ( range 5m) OKW: Sturms: 3487 damage * 4 / 780 \| 480 = 17.88\| 29.04 Volks. 960 damage * 5 / 640MP = 7.5 Ost: Pio. 1476 damage * 4 / 570MP \| 370MP = 10.32 \| 16 Gren: 1216 damage * 4 / 645MP = 7.52 USF: RE. 1106 damage * 4 / 550MP \| 350MP = 8.04 \| 12.64 Rifles. 1404 damage * 5 / 700MP = 10 Sov: Eng: 746 damage * 4 / 482MP \| 312 = 6.16 \| 9.6 Cons. 698 damage * 6 / 560 = 7.5 UKF: RE. 1480 damage * 4 / 562MP = 10.52 IS. 1041 damage * 4 / 700 \| 420 = 5.92 \| 9.88 Cover 1101 damage * 4 / 700 \| 420 = 6.28 \| 10.48 In: Lobby
Thread: CheatCommands Mod II Beta24 Mar 2016, 20:24 PM Seemed to be missing the Brit sniper, unless I was being dim. Could I request a feature? As well as DPS would it be possible to display the suppression a unit takes? Edit: Where are my manners. Thank you, it is an awesome piece of work. In: Modding and Tools
Thread: coh2 dps chart24 Mar 2016, 18:52 PM Bren lmg is the standard. Vickers K is the upgrade. No idea why the upgrade does half the dps, and less than an equivalently priced Bren... In: Lobby
Thread: My opinion re war spoils changes24 Mar 2016, 18:48 PM If you could use more than 3 I think my AECs could be going 35% faster... In: Lobby
Thread: Were Brens/weapon pickups fixed on vet 3 IS or not?24 Mar 2016, 18:16 PM Think they give a 7% buff so yeah utterly pointless. If they had extra range or abilities then I could see the point though merely adding a bit to the normal rifles with Vet, which would technically be a slight nerf, would be far preferable. In: COH2 Gameplay