Profile of poop

Jump back to quoted post25 Dec 2015, 00:49 AMnodickwilliams

Pwerfer still has inherent disadvantage of being in wehr t4

Jump back to quoted post11 Dec 2015, 23:03 PMAchtAchter

Remember kids, most people saying the P4's is fine at 150 fuel here also said that the Churchill is fine at 150 fuel :^)

Jump back to quoted post9 Dec 2015, 08:15 AMA big guy 4u

You know it's going to be salty if it's a thread about Soviet balance

1.Katyusha
After the huge nerfing it's received, why does it fire so slowly? The original intention in the gap of the salvos was so that Axis players could react to the Katyusha's awesome firepower. But now, not only is it patheticaly weak, it's also slow. Katyusha needs a damage buff and the silly gap in the salvo needs to be removed. It should fire all at once like the panzerwerfer.

2.SU-85
Oh boy. Where do I start? This supposed 'tank destroyer' bonces shots at a panther, costs more than a StuG, but is slower, less accurate and penetrates less. It shouldn't be priced down, but rather should have it's abilities increased to its resource value.

3.T34/85
Needs a serious damage and penetration buff. It should be able to reliably penetrate the frontal armor of panthers and Panzer IV ausf.J. It's almost as expensive as an easy eight but it is nowhere near as good.

Jump back to quoted post9 Dec 2015, 04:04 AMAppleseed

lol you shouldn't count that way 150 MP + 15 FU + 50 MU for 1 bazooka vs 90MU for 1 shrek is just bad comparison, if you count the number of bazooka and shrek both side got, for example I never see USF with less than 4 bazooka so it is 150MP + 15FU + 200MU vs 450MU for 4 shreks, in this comparison i believe 250MU worth more than 150MP + 15FU. and USF can get 2 for each sq while OKW can only get 1, so it is like a Troll fee for me. if put tech price should give OKW same able to upgrade to 2 shrek with cheaper price maybe like 60MU, trust me you don't want see double shrek VG blob...

Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2015, 09:49 AMKozokus

Hello.

You might be right as there is very few point point in building placement when teching as OST/SOV (or build twice the same one). I remember in DOW2 that teching was only a matter of upgrade T1-T2-T3 something like UKF.

For OST-SOV it means 2 things : it withdraw a squad from the battlefield fot the build time (+retreat+comeback) and (as you said) it is a huge loss, should you loose all your engineer squad in combat something much more affordable in other factions.

That beeing said, Engeneers are not really combat squads (unless flame-upgraded) but offers so much utility compared t other builders that they should spend a lot of time on the battlefield, capping there and building things.

I think i do agree with you. Old gamelplay sticking.

Kozo.