Profile of poop

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 174

General Information


Thread: Your Dream commander16 Jan 2016, 00:25 AM custom commanders -could- work, but there would have to be something like a CP cap, so all your things could not exceed some kind of total value. or a rule (soviet example) 1 Tank Tech: T34/85, IS-2, ISU-152 1 Call-In Infantry: AT-Party, AI-Party, Shocks, Gaurds, HM-120, DsHK, M5 1 Call-In Attack Propaganda, Incendiary, Sturmv straif, sturmv loiter, IL-2 bomber 1 Ability Spy Network, Mark Vehicle, For Mother Russia, Rapid Cons, Supply Drop, Recon, vehicle detection, Radio, Booby Trap, HQ 1 Unit Modifier PPSH, PTRS, Vehicle Crew, Ambush, Hit the Dirt!, artillery construction? B-4? ML-120?, In: Lobby
Thread: 4v4AT Flexi Tourney. Place your bets.16 Jan 2016, 00:03 AM flexi is a fun word. flexi. In: Lobby
Thread: How come ppl have probs with FRPs all the sudden15 Jan 2016, 20:08 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 19:54 PMBIH_kirov_QC What mean FRP? forward retreat point In: COH2 Balance
Thread: YOUR Faction of Choice14 Jan 2016, 07:05 AM I want to like soviets.. I really do. But I'm just better with Brits. In: Lobby
Thread: something has to be done with retreat points.13 Jan 2016, 03:41 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2016, 22:00 PMnee Forward Retreat are fundamental elements of the WFA+UKF factions. You can't just give it to other factions or remove them entirely, and expect that to just to be the solution. WFA and UKF would have to have halftracks to justify the change. Both UKF and USF already have doctrinal halftracks, which means you'd have to make major revisions to faction design. Not to mention, make all of these factions lose unique flavour. Then there's map design. Huge maps favour forward retreat heavily whereas small maps make them irrelevant. and why would you need to give them HTs? OKW already have resupply + medic truck USF already have ambulance UKF have resupply tent + weapon racks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mortars should cause abandon on tanks with exposed crew13 Jan 2016, 03:37 AM nope In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Remove FRP? yay or nay.12 Jan 2016, 08:45 AM yeah, its loss of time. FRP allows the player to make critical mistakes and not get penalized for it. retreating a squad for Ost or Sov is a critical decision because you will lose that unit and potentially map control for 3 minutes. with FRP it is a no-brainer, hit retreat, come back in 25 seconds. FRP: "oh a squad is suppressed? retreat and return instantly." No FRP: "oh a squad is suppressed? can i flank the MG? can i save enough of that squad before the MG gets them?" it just becomes an easy button for making a mistake, which not only saves the FRP player, but takes away the reward for whoever made the right play. Poll should change to: remove nerf keep In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remove FRP? yay or nay.12 Jan 2016, 07:33 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2016, 07:09 AMpigsoup what about man power keep up? 10 pop? upkeep would actually be pretty nice, wouldnt want it to be bypassed with the toggle though. you could hotkey it and avoid the bleed pretty easy. cant speak on popcap, as i dont know the values until i have none left In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remove FRP? yay or nay.12 Jan 2016, 06:51 AM for those who voted no, what would you think of: 1) a munition cost for each usage of a FRP, that way they are not gone, but actually have a true "cost", because right now, its hella cheap for what it does, and teh benefit it gives. 2) pushing it down the tech tree 3) re-buying it after usage, MP bleep for the convenience. any of those work for ya? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Reinforcing conscripts should be 15 MP12 Jan 2016, 06:37 AM non-doc rapid conscription my main gripe is how cons are only 10mp less than volks, yet volks turn into anti-everything-flame-shreks at no fuel cost.. meanwhile conscripts get ... ooorah? In: COH2 Balance