Profile of Pablonano

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 297

General Information


Thread: My art contribution to this site :)16 Mar 2016, 17:48 PM Noice In: Lobby
Thread: Airborne and Pathfinders lower CP ?16 Mar 2016, 17:46 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2016, 11:35 AMKatitof Lack of camo from the start is irrelevant. USF have nothing that would allow that camo potential to be used, pathfinders don't have any kind of camo ambush bonus and don't need to close in on anything, they have the camo "just because" as I don't see any tactical reason it would give any kind of advantage for them, they can't be used as self reliant squad and rifles can't camo, USF doesn't have any indirect weapons which would use the sight, they camo just like sov snipers, so you can't even scout stealthy. I'm not saying the camo is useless, but it definitely doesn't have any purpose. Recon pathfinders at least can call-in arty. Bottom line is, JLI have a clear role and perform for the cost while pathfinders are more expensive, 4 men rifles with potentially better long range dps. Did some test, and they seem to be pretty similar with the exception that Jaegers are slighly better at fight. In the only thing that pathfinders are better is basically on killing wounded since the Jaeger sniper has really long times between shots. Jagers are a bit expensiver, but pathfinders could still use some cost decrease to more or less 260 manpower cost. I wont find too logic go lower because his camo is the combat one,they camo sometimes between shots, something that reduces the chances of them getting killed in the middle of a fight by just hold the fire while other units get the agro. Off-topic I aswell took some time to test and ironically found that penals are better than riflemen at almost every range and level unless at vet3 long range (seriously, at vet 0/1 CQC it was rape) and that tiger ACE is better than KT In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Countering coh2.org trolls and smurf16 Mar 2016, 15:46 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2016, 15:03 PMGeneral Tao We need the official forums back for those people to go back to. They were like a midway between this glorious pinnacle of CoH achievement and the cancerous cess-pit of the steam forums what does make you think that they arent gona stay here? In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Countering coh2.org trolls and smurf16 Mar 2016, 15:39 PM Are we playing secret hitler? Because this looks like a fascism law In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Airborne and Pathfinders lower CP ?16 Mar 2016, 10:52 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2016, 07:57 AMKatitof JLI have that and much, much more(put salvage instead of beacon), same price, incomparably better scaling and combat performance. But jagers doesnt have camo from the start, but they come out of buildings, something i cant trule understand in terms of manpower add, because partisans being performing as his price like a normal call in unit. Aswell you forget that Jagers are more for harass on the back lines than actually scouts, since his skills are made for: take out the mortar--->recicle it, cap the cut off------>Booby trap it. Pathfinders are more focushed on:get them to a good spoot for an eagle nest and then camo in some point to give LoS. Maybe they could use a slighly cost decrease, but i never found the situation were i had a 1vs1 grenadiers/pathfinders, even more now that everyone goes calliope/persing In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Italian Army by GrenadierIT19 (same on the official forum)16 Mar 2016, 02:44 AM Its not Glitte one, that one was awesome In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Airborne and Pathfinders lower CP ?16 Mar 2016, 02:29 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Mar 2016, 17:41 PMKatitof That isn't really worth 280 mp they cost. Dunno really, if i look at it as a combat unit i would agre, but having camo, extra LoS, radar/beacon and "enforcer tactician" i dont know if it should cost any lower, but dont really know. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Airborne and Pathfinders lower CP ?15 Mar 2016, 17:25 PM pathfinders arent specially made to fight, so instead of search how to improve that point would be better to improve for what are they made: recon and set airlanding zones with his beacon and ocasionally support other units sniping wounded guys, at least in my opinion. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 1v1 / 2v2 - Anyone using Churchills?15 Mar 2016, 15:22 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Mar 2016, 15:17 PMKatitof So can the Comet with emergency war speed. you can give churchill warspeed if you have a teammate that jolly cooperates In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 1v1 / 2v2 - Anyone using Churchills?15 Mar 2016, 14:56 PM I like churchills because they are that kind of tank that can enter in FoW and get out of any kind of trouble In: COH2 Balance