Profile of Stug life

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 4474

General Information


Thread: indirect fire support8 Sep 2019, 12:40 PM for mortar ok for tank no, apart from puppchen, AT guns use heavy cover to survive In: Lobby
Thread: USA September patch discussion8 Sep 2019, 12:20 PM Can we put a copy paste of the rifle man at tier 0 for osther but remove bunker from green, seems a fair trade In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Shrecks. Blobbing in 2v2s and above8 Sep 2019, 10:16 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2019, 06:56 AMMazianni Honestly would have much preferred if the Shrek upgrade for PzGrens and Pfussies only gave one Shrek and maybe the Vehicle detection ability Stormtroopers get (it'd be cheaper of course). The way it is currently, that squad basically becomes a light vehicle deleting tool (240 damage salvo) and, if spammed, become very potent versus armor. By limiting the Shreks per squad, their individual power decreases signifigantly, but so also does the incentive to spam them (especially Panzerfusiliers). But I really don't think this is something that is going to be fixed atm. Right now you just really have to go hard on HMG deployment (spam tbh) to suppress Shrek groups, and hope the enemy doesn't have rocket artillery up already. Soviets are probably worst off tbh since their MG sucks, as USF at least I've been able to counter it decently enough with M2HBs and BAR'd riflemen. they did 1 shrek, they were op cause they kept the ai and at ability In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The State of Conscript Assault Package in the current game.7 Sep 2019, 18:43 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2019, 18:09 PMdistrofio we agree with the lavanade impact, but maxims in garrison are durable enough to withstand a single lavanade withouth dying, either replace it with another maxim or soft retreat it nah that's cause lava nade is bugged, it applies damage only on the base floor In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion7 Sep 2019, 15:41 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2019, 14:21 PMMr.Flush Everyone who plays usf for long periods of time knows the usf mortar is garbage. is that why pro player use it ? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The State of Conscript Assault Package in the current game.7 Sep 2019, 14:03 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2019, 13:50 PMBlueKnight Please, put husband in T0 I too think that con PPSh package comes pretty late considering OST have Assgrens with 5x MP40 and sprint from the start if they pick such doctrine, no MU investment in MP40 whatsoever. u could make the same argument with every doc unit tho ass enegier exist In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The State of Conscript Assault Package in the current game.7 Sep 2019, 10:06 AM if im not wrong u need tier 1 built for both okw ans ukf tho In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW September patch discussion7 Sep 2019, 09:41 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2019, 08:46 AMGrim Agreed, otherwise it will be a nightmare guessing which ones are completely self spotting and which ones are not. Not sure if the UF bunker has the same sight range but if so same applied to that too. wish they give the reinforce and medic bunker to that doc too tho In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USA September patch discussion7 Sep 2019, 09:39 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2019, 05:34 AMddd "Nerf all mortar affect ostheer the most" - completly ignoring the fact usf has no other non doc early garrison counter than shitty mortar. BTW i like how MOD comes here to derail thread with stupid post and then casualy says: back to usf topic please This forum is a mess. well yes, there are fan bois whom pollute every thread with fake stats and opinions In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why not give Partisans the treatment6 Sep 2019, 18:41 PM >the treatment what do they have cancer ? In: COH2 Balance