Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Opponent infantry always outranges me22 Oct 2022, 14:20 PM maybe the game hates you? Try using attack move order... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: nerf the fking pathfinder and Howitzer22 Oct 2022, 14:17 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2022, 13:08 PMWilly Pete Rifles are definitely relevant to paths spam. That like saying volks arent relevant if someone made a thread about fussies Even tho paths aren't meant as a mainline like fussies, ppl are certainly using them that way. Thats the key to playing airborne, build as few rifles as possible Of coarse the cost efficiency of Riflemen and of Pathfinder is relevant as to what one will choose to build. If Pathfinder are more cost efficient than Riflemen does not necessarily mean that Riflemen are an UP unit as some people seem to claim. Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2022, 13:08 PMWilly Pete Both can be true. That's not a contradictory statement to "rifles aren't cost effective" And again its not proof that Riflemen are an UP. There is little to support the claim that USF as a faction is weak vs Ostheer or to support that riflemen are UP. In any case Pathfinders should be fixed. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: nerf the fking pathfinder and Howitzer22 Oct 2022, 09:19 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2022, 07:53 AMMr Carmine Rifles not being cost effective has been said for quite a while. That people will use better options is only logical. That also leads to threads like this. And just because it has been "said" by some people it does not mean it true but not really the topic of this thread. Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2022, 07:53 AMMr Carmine Rifles are often not replaced when lost because how much they cost/drain your recourses and they face stock and probably vetted axis elites by that time. That and rear echelons being almost impotent is the underlying issue. Or that is simply an indication of how good USF elite infatry are Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2022, 07:53 AMMr Carmine Back to pio,s vision. If your mg 42 gets flanked in the first minute or 2 its not a weakness that needs to be covered by bonus sight from the first second. The mg 42 supresses near instantly most of the time. So if the bonus vision kicks in later its more balanced when there is more going on and to micro. If you want to talk about Pioneer sight I suggest you start a thread about it since this one is about Pathfinders and howitzers. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Thoughts on the M-42?22 Oct 2022, 09:14 AM There are differences between barrages and autofire. Even if timed, autofire HE with 50-60 range can the cause issues that existed before. Main difference would be an mu cost. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Thoughts on the M-42?22 Oct 2022, 05:59 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2022, 23:08 PMdonofsandiego If this were to be the case, then it would need to be buffed because a single HE shot is not worth a single damn as it is now. Too inaccurate and too weak to be worth any amount of munitions. Maybe if it was free (obviously with some kind of 30 second cooldown or something). Timed ability costing munitions makes more sense to me. If it a single shot it can have range up to 60. Point here is that a firing mode with HE is a bad design and that is why it was nerfed to 35 range. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: nerf the fking pathfinder and Howitzer21 Oct 2022, 20:26 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2022, 17:10 PMMr Carmine That has more to do with pathf and pack howi/scott then anything else imo. Without paths those numbers will change quite bit i think. That is a very big assumption on your side and if true a big reason to change pathfinder since their performance is hiding other issues. Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2022, 17:10 PMMr Carmine Putting the 42 vision range behind a bp is the right choice imo. If we ever get a patch ofcourse. not really relevant to to Pathfinders. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: nerf the fking pathfinder and Howitzer21 Oct 2022, 16:42 PM The Ostheer/USF win ratio in 1vs1 for the last patch is 49/51 and 47/53 for top 200, that is an indication that Ostheer do not need a nerf vs USF. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Thoughts on the M-42?21 Oct 2022, 14:45 PM Possible changes could include some of the following: Lower CP so the unit can be used earlier especially in large modes Remove HE firing mode (which is a bad design) if there is a need for it replace it with a single ability shot Decrease pop by 1 Increase damage to 100 Increase accuracy In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Thoughts on the M-42?19 Oct 2022, 12:00 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2022, 22:05 PMKatukov I can guarantee to you, right now, that no matter how hard you try, you wont reach more than maybe ONE vet 3 M-42 in 10 or so games If M-42 has trouble veting up than there hardly any reason for buffing the vet 3 bonuses. And there are other modes than 4vs4. Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2022, 22:05 PMKatukov these can fire constantly and you'll only reach vet 2 semi consistently, and one of the almost GUARANTEED stukas, LEFHs, or panzerwerfers will nuke it once it DOES get vet Guess some people can't miss the opportunity to rant about how much greener the grass is on the other side. Even so if it is an issue that is not a M-42 issue but it applies to most ATG/Support weapons both allies and Axis. The issues with HE mode is that it simply should not be there since an ATG should not be able autofire HE rounds. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Thoughts on the M-42?18 Oct 2022, 20:43 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2022, 20:04 PMKurobane M-42 needs the ability to retreat like the Raketenwerfer and better Vet. Gaining its 50 range back on the HE barrage on Vet 3 would be fine. Only it is not a barrage but an auto attack and it should simply not have 50 range on a the HE autofire at any vet level. In: COH2 Gameplay