Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - USF Feedback13 Apr 2021, 11:02 AM Popularity across all modes: Urban Assault Company 8.25 Airborne Company 8 Infantry Company 6.75 Heavy Cavalry Company 5.75 Tactical Support Company 5.25 Recon Support Company 3.5 Mechanized Company 3 Armor Company 2.75 Rifle Company 1.75 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - British Feedback13 Apr 2021, 10:50 AM Popularity across all modes: Mobile Assault Regiment 8.5 Royal Artillery Regiment 8.25 Royal Engineer Regiment 6.25 Commando Regiment 5.75 Vanguard Operations Regiment 5.75 Special Weapons Regiment 4 Lend Lease Assault Regiment 3.75 Advanced Emplacement Regiment 1.5 Tactical Support Regiment 1.5 Note had bad AER and STR score across all modes. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback13 Apr 2021, 10:33 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2021, 10:32 AMmrgame2 thanks mate, AT overwatch (sov one) seems too low damage as it seems deadly ingame lol. hopefully we can review those AT rockets and perhaps beless deadly It it has high ROF that increase when target remain visible if ?I remember correctly. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback13 Apr 2021, 10:32 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2021, 09:40 AMSmartie Ost commanders Looking Pretty good so far. One of the things I would like to see: - Stuka AT Strafe to Mobile Defense instead of Panzer Tactician - Stuka AT Strafe removed from Jaeger Armor, replaced by AI strafe Imo: German Mechanized Doctrine, Festung Support Doctrine will be contentment to obscurity CAS/Ostrrtuppen/Defensive/Mobile will continue to see little action Strategic reserves/Elite will see a drop in their number since the earlier CP of Tiger and the tech cost will make them less disable. While Jaeger/Jaeger armor/Spearhead will remain some of the most popular and might even become more popular. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback13 Apr 2021, 10:25 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2021, 09:50 AMmrgame2 anyone knows the resources and difference between AT rockets ? AT overwatch IL2 Ju87 p47 Hawker? I find all AT rocket too strong, maybe a nerf in the damage output. at least infantry strife you cant wipe them as long you retreat I am looking from older report file so something might not be up to date and I might have confused a weapon 60 damage 260/260/260 penetration 320 damage 340/340/340 50 damage 180/170/160 120 damage 160/160/160 80 damage 420/420/420 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: A corrected model for infantry DPS13 Apr 2021, 10:13 AM Good work. well done In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - British Feedback13 Apr 2021, 10:12 AM Some of the issues with raid section are: 1) Too many advantage over IS, same DPS with no need for cover and only a slight reduction in Target size when in cover 2) Access to too many perk that IS require tech for, bolster/grenades/weapon upgrade which allow them fast teching to vehicles 3) Vet 1 bonus that makes very little sense 4) Commander they are available. The commander is actually one of the most popular commanders across all mode and does not really needs to become more attractive. Overlap in the commander with RoE with flamer/Commandos 5) Vicker-K as "assault rifle" seem odd choice and creates issues with other unit that have access to it like M3 and the Heavy sapper. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback12 Apr 2021, 20:18 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2021, 19:43 PMTiger Baron Wait they added the same hull down for Ost for the KV1 only as a vet 1 ability or something? Since when and with what animations exactly? The bonuses are not the same: KV-1 Name: "Hull Down" Duration: Toggle Ability Cost: Free +15% reload speed. -20% received damage. Vehicle can't move. Ostheer Name: "Hull Down" Duration: None Cost: Free -25% received damage. +25% weapon range. Vehicle can't move. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - USF Feedback12 Apr 2021, 17:56 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2021, 17:50 PMpvtgooner No what you said was "No more LMG on USF troops pls." and then when i asked why rifles shouldnt have them you said because its like axis that shouldnt have mid range upgrades?? And that was in response to suggestions to add M1919 to another commander. The post did not mean to removed the M1919 from the commanders it already exist but not to add in more commanders. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - USF Feedback12 Apr 2021, 17:47 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2021, 17:30 PMpvtgooner That makes no sense. The upgrades allow for diverse build orders and different playstyles. If there are no m1919, USF will have no way to trade infantry in long range battles. and thats on top of a commander pick. In fact, all m1919 upgrades are doctrinal. You're just suggesting to remove basic functionality from commanders on the basis of the balance you made up in your head. Why shouldnt axis mainline infantry have an upgrade that allows them to trade and win at mid range? I did not suggest that M1919 should be removed from the commander they already exist in. What I have said is that imo M1919 should not be added to more USF commanders. I also suggested that USF could get an upgrade(or ability) that allowed them to use rifles with better far DPS. In: COH2 Balance