Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback14 Apr 2021, 06:49 AM Soviet have: B-4 Counterattack Tactics Tank hunter Tactics Ml-20 Guard Rifle Combined Arms Tactics Soviet Combined Arms Army Soviet Reserve Army Terror Tactics For a total of 6 commanders In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Suggestion to compare Infantry Combat14 Apr 2021, 06:43 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Apr 2021, 06:11 AMTickTack ... Please define EHP in your post above. EHP stand for effective Hit point. In this case his mean total HP divided by target size (and multiplied by armor if any) In: Lobby
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - USF Feedback13 Apr 2021, 21:32 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2021, 21:26 PMDescolata I believe TS is just underloaded. And you know off maps are very much not created equal. TS is a weak team game doctrine with what was a garbage off-map (thank you patch notes!). Infantry has the only guaranteed howitzer killing off-map, rifleman field defenses, and the only real howitzer for USF. TS wants to be Infantry, but misses the rest of the long-range rifle support and two low impact off-maps. USF gets great recon planes non-doc, the doc option isn't worth it. And the Calliope and the P47 strafe are both blob control tools, resulting in serious redundancy. The doc needs an AT source or consistent fortification control. It needs something more. UA is a bit overloaded. The WP tank rounds are fun but absolutely overkill. A tank shouldn't counter its counter, which WP absolutely does. The Dozer blade is in a good place otherwise, and with Mechanized losing its blade UA will be (I believe) the only Dozer Blade doctrine. Then we agree. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Suggestion to compare Infantry Combat13 Apr 2021, 19:35 PM Interesting approach. If one to be more "accurate" one probably has also to measure the bleed in manpower of causalities. In: Lobby
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - OKW Feedback13 Apr 2021, 19:13 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2021, 18:55 PMFunPolice ... I would also like to see resources vehicles in Scavenger since it fits the theme, an opel or 223 with less pop/fuel cost and less fighting capabilities or some other implementation maybe with mechanisms that steal resources from enemy sectors. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - USF Feedback13 Apr 2021, 19:10 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2021, 18:20 PMDescolata I think your analyses of UA vs Tactical support is off. UA is a complete doc with viable tools that support eachother throughout, especially in urban environments. UA works in every map size Tactical Support doesnt have that quality of commander design. Its just an inferiorly designed doctrine. We see Calliopes are highly rated by TS in 4th most popular 4v4 even with poor design. Tactical Support needs a clarification of what it does, which is a weird jumble right now. .... I have a different opinion: Tactical support is a well designed commander that follows the Infantry commander design. Both have LMG, both have a light vehicle (MHT/M5), both have an off map, while infatry get mines and Tactical get recon. On the other hand Urban defense gets much more, no tech grenades, superior mediums and less micro (can keep AP round and fire WP against soft targets), superior infatry in Rangers, one of the best smoke in game with cover to cover, plus the Calliope. The commander is simply overloaded and above other commanders and those show in picks. In numbers UA score consistently above TS in all modes being first or second pick. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback13 Apr 2021, 18:08 PM I am not sure why the focus of rocket run is the Elefant. The commander seems to in low pick rate in 3vs3 and 4vs4 compared to 1vs1 2vs2. Second pick at 1vs1/2vs2 falling to six pick at 3vs3 and ninth at 4vs4 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Higher armour for Panthers13 Apr 2021, 16:47 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2021, 16:43 PMZyllen If you ask me the solution for the current allied TD problem for the OKW should be fond in the jp4. it needs to trade its armor for higher ROF It ROF is fine. The problem is the cost and POP. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback13 Apr 2021, 16:45 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2021, 16:35 PMgeneral_gawain You don't said "the most cost efficient allround unit", you said "the most cost efficient AT unit". PFs have higher AT alpha damage and higher AT DPS too if you factor in their higher penetration. In addition their vet1 ability to spot with flares comes in very handy. Assault Guards wil be better at AI to make up for that. Both units are pretty cost efficient overall. It not that that AI that makes the difference it is extra model. 6 men can stand take more punishment before the have to retreat. The AI is extra bonus since AG can actually fight infatry and have the grenade barrage. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback13 Apr 2021, 15:24 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2021, 15:13 PMgeneral_gawain It will be a close battle between Assault Guards and PFs. I don't think it that close. 6 men with 2 elite bazooka +4 SVT is more cost efficient than 5 men with shreck 3 k98. In: COH2 Balance