Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Stealth detection on is16 Dec 2022, 13:14 PM Commandos also seem to have better detection than other infatry so they can see other stealth infatry before themselves can be detected. Combined with their camo it also problem. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Light vehicles vs sniper16 Dec 2022, 13:12 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Dec 2022, 00:59 AMKatukov "I failed to 222 rush a soviet sniper, can we make it so LVs autotarget snipers pls lelic?" Why do you have to troll and derail every thread? even the ones in the bugs section. What applies to 222 also applies to m20 so this not an axis/allied thing you can relax... In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Light vehicles vs sniper15 Dec 2022, 23:18 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2022, 20:27 PMaerafield Huh? Once you gave the vehicle an attack order on the sniper, it won't change target unless it loses line of sight. No matter how many movement orders you give Only it it stays in range, in any case these unit are meant to counter snipers and thus sniper should have higher priority than other targets In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Building question15 Dec 2022, 22:16 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2022, 20:24 PMaerafield Just quickly tested it to be sure, most explosive weapons have it with the exception of tanks that don't fire high explosive rounds like T34 or P4, and satchel charges T-34/76 should have it PZ4 does not seem to have it which seem to be an oversight. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Light vehicles vs sniper15 Dec 2022, 20:01 PM The priority of sniper for light vehicles (especially the one with turrets) seem to be low so they will prioritize other targets before firing on snipers. That should be fixed since one can not drive the vehicle and choose the target with these vehicles which help sniper on retreat. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Building question15 Dec 2022, 19:58 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2022, 16:06 PMaerafield I think only flamethrowers and demo charges have this IIRC From small arm probably only flamers have it. Many explosive weapon including grenades have it. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Building question15 Dec 2022, 12:01 PM Some other points: 1) in order for a weapon to do damage to all entities in a garrison it needs to have "damage all in hold" set to true. 2) there diffident type of garrison with separate modifiers like houses/trenches/emplacements 3) Luch benefits from point blank mechanism and will do ignore cover if it is close enough. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Building question14 Dec 2022, 22:53 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2022, 21:44 PMrumartinez89 Garrison also gets reload bonus right? Garrison provides "cover bonuses" for units like IS/Ostruppen but that about it. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Building question14 Dec 2022, 18:33 PM Point blank mechanism does not apply to garrisoned troops. If attacking unit move to cover close to garrison they will still fire vs garrison while garrison will fire with point blank negating cover. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: nerf the fking pathfinder and Howitzer13 Dec 2022, 15:31 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Dec 2022, 14:20 PMGachiGasm If your "want to win" implies that its un-winnable otherwise, no. If your "want to win" means playing the game without shooting yourself in the knee, yes. This is what has been posted in the first page of this thread: Jump back to quoted post15 Oct 2022, 15:12 PMReverb Pathfinder and howitzer need to be good because riflemen are so bad. Worst mainline in the game by far. Such absolute trash. Do you agree that Riflemen are "absolute trash" and that creates the necessity to for Pathfinder to be OP Yes or No? Jump back to quoted post13 Dec 2022, 14:20 PMGachiGasm You can litteraly find pro-player streaming those gamemodes to see how they they play USF. In 1v1 airborn is picked solely because it allows you to ignore USF tech and get AT gun+MG, no-one spams paths in 1v1 and no-one use airborn in 1v1 because of them. Do they produce Pathfinder yes or no? Jump back to quoted post13 Dec 2022, 14:20 PMGachiGasm Speaking off, it even if we forget about pathfinders and imagine that every one plays infantry company. Again it completely changes how rifles are played, because of the LMG. So even if Airborn wasn't even picked, people in teamgames are just avoiding stock rifles gameplay to begin with. And yet Urban assault with no LMGs is more popular than tactical Support with LMGs. Claiming that Rifle company primarily is LMG is an oversimplification. Jump back to quoted post13 Dec 2022, 14:20 PMGachiGasm I mean if you want to look at facts objectively and not just push your narrative for the sake on continuous argument, they are actually completely in line. I've yet to see any attempt to prove why rifles arent sucking balls in teamgames, besides "well win rates", despite people giving clear explanation and reasoning why rifles design isn't working in teamgames. I am neither pushing any narrative nor I am not arguing contentiously. What I have post is pretty clear: Contrary to claims Riflemen are not crap/sucking balls (they might not be cost efficient but that isa difrent thing) Contrary to claims Pathfinder do need to be OP because Riflemen crap Pathfinder acting as core army units and Pathfinder/Scott combo need to fixed regardless of Riflemen performance. If you want my opinion on, one the changes that affected USF the most, it was the buff to medics, that made USF faction going from having the best healing in game (allowing player to get more out of their Riflemen) ending up with one of the worse healing. (edited) In: COH2 Balance