Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Axis Supply Drop6 Jan 2016, 21:36 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2016, 19:35 PMCuddletronic That's from the Preview Notes. That change never made it in to the Live Patch due to a bunch of knock-on Bugs it created. That seems reason enough to keep preview notes and balance notes separately imo. Its too confusing... In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Target weak point nerf.5 Jan 2016, 13:33 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Dec 2015, 19:17 PMwhitesky00 ... Mark Target is counterable after the fact with AA? I'm not sure. ... AA can shoot down the plane providing vision on target the debuff stays on.... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Inventory Full bug solutions5 Jan 2016, 12:42 PM As it know when a player's inventory reaches 1.000 items inventory item including commanders start behaving radically. Since I estimate there around 700 unique inventory items available including commanders, bulletins, skins, victory strikes and face-plates I would recommend one of the following changes: Either increase number of slot to 1200-1500 On instead of duplicated item taking 2 slots have them take 1 but have number indicating how many times the item exists. That would also help scrolling thru inventory faster... PLS also consider transfer of items from 1 account to another even if it is limited to same person... In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Wehrmacht T45 Jan 2016, 12:26 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jan 2016, 21:31 PMausterlitz The teching cost is simply too high. Imo an alternative solution is worth trying: Instead of reducing cost, change the units available from it. Imo the current issue with T4 is not simply the actual high cost of teching but the combination of high tech cost, high units cost available and specialized role of units... Having that said a I thing it worth trying leaving cost as is but moving Brumbar to t3 and Ostwind in T4. This will change the almost compulsory linear building order of Otheer allowing either to go T3 and still have access to a Soak damage/barrage support unit in the Brumbar or avoid building t3 and going for an Ostwind that can help until a Panther can be built... It will also make Brumbar (and probably Ostwind) more attractive since currently it see little usage. In: Lobby
Thread: Lack of anti-garrison for UKF3 Jan 2016, 19:29 PM Imo is the other way around. Most faction have more antigarrison than they should. Having antigarrison weapons like molotovs and flame-grenades available in mainline infantries increases their utility too much making other specialized infantries not worth it. Why one should make other types of infantries when his conscripts or V.G. have so much utility? Take penal for instance their kit is designed against bunkers and garrison and should shine in urban maps but why bother Con can use molotovs and clear garrison. Or jaggers again designed for urban map, why bother with them, when V.G. can easily clear garrison... Think moving incendiary weapon away from mainline infantries to specialized infantry would make the later more attractive, would close the gap between UKF and other factions abilities to deal with garrison, would make trenches better and generally open the way for diverse strategies... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Miragefla's December Balance Mod Additions3 Jan 2016, 10:25 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Jan 2016, 08:52 AMmiragefla I would fix that, but I held off as the garrison was more of an issue. I may go back to standardize the numbers. One of the issue with Centaur in you mode is that is is too good against ATG even if it attack them frontally, especially against the rakketen. Before your changes at least one could garrison the rakketn or V.G. to keep away a Centaur....Puma can only kite the Centaur since it dies to fast and that would leave only the late expensive JP as hard Counter... Imo AA weapons ability to clear garrison is adding utility to units that already have plenty. They already dominate open field (and some of them can suppress), there is little reason to also dominate Urban maps and be able to counter garrison as well... In: Modding and Tools
Thread: Squad Population issue2 Jan 2016, 16:10 PM I took the numbers from : http://www.stat.coh2.hu/index.php and they seem to have a different number if hover over the icon or open the units page... In game they seem to be 7... They still remain a mess 8 for assault engineers and 9 paratroopers make little sense. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Squad Population issue2 Jan 2016, 13:35 PM Pop need to need to looked at: Sturm officer 8 P.F. 6 Jaeger 8 Grenadier 8 Pg 9 Field artillery officer 9 assault grenadier 5 Strom 8 Conscripts 6 Partisan 4 LT 8 Ranger 10 Assault engineer 8 generally it seems messed up...following little logic... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Strompioneer vet3 works reversely, please fix2 Jan 2016, 11:43 AM Vet abilities and vet bonuses seems to be a mess in general. EFA bonuses especially, since the have not change almost since release to adapt to new stats and roles of units that have changed significantly. Allot of them are almost identical to units of the same faction and type (tanks,infantries...) not custom made for each units and its role. There are even units that can not vet at all... Imo top priority for Relic should be a veterancy system overhaul. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Miragefla's December Balance Mod Additions1 Jan 2016, 23:44 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2016, 23:35 PMmiragefla Centaur Increased the damage of the Centaur against garrisoned troops as it can no longer hit additional members with AOE after the Centaur changes. -Damage against garrisons from 0.5 to 0.75 Consider bringing damage vs cover inline with other units. This units has full accuracy and damage vs yellow and full damage vs green.. In: Modding and Tools