Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Royal artillery29 May 2018, 10:33 AM Valentine needs to lose Radar so it can balanced like light-meduim tank. The radar or some other form of observation can then become an upgrade similar to command vehicle that could add penalties to the vehicle. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: sexton: Why it suck and how to make it better.29 May 2018, 07:36 AM Jump back to quoted post29 May 2018, 04:50 AMFiresparks ... The royal artillery doctrine itself doesn't have recon+ off map. ... That is a bit inaccurate. "Early warning" is a Recon "Concentration barrage" is practically an "Off map" for all practical purposes (it is simply delivered from on map indestructible guns). It can be used to destroy an on map artillery piece. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: sexton: Why it suck and how to make it better.27 May 2018, 08:40 AM Jump back to quoted post27 May 2018, 08:31 AMFiresparks You are missing some of the most important stats like cooldown of barrage ability, scatter ratio, vet bonuses, kill radius. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?27 May 2018, 08:07 AM All incendiary grenades should not be available to mainline infantry but moved to specialized units. Connecting OKW tech to set up buildings is bad because truck placement is map depended. I really see little reason against OKW Side tech. SP concussion grenade could be redesigned to do have extra affects vs garrison/heavy cover and be available earlier. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW vet nerfed a bit too much?26 May 2018, 11:45 AM The whole vet system needs to be looked at. Currently: Su-76 Xp value is too low Penal vet bonuses are too high Conscripts vet 3 bonuses are better than Vg vet 3 bonuses Some vet abilities are too strong other useless Xp values, vetting speed, vet abilities and vet bonuses all need to be looked at (they should had been looked year ago) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: stun grenade bug25 May 2018, 12:02 PM I had USF mortar become broken after being hit by assault grenade stun grenade on retreat. The unit got stuck in retreat for 5 minute and then it would no longer work even if re-crewed by enemy. I was under the impression this bug was fixed. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Cruzz's The More You Know25 May 2018, 08:40 AM Jump back to quoted post25 May 2018, 00:00 AMCruzz Minor update, added in the missing USF 76mm Sherman and Brit 17 pounder emplacements to the file. Tested the garrison cover damage modifier, it doesn't affect the damage you do to the building. thanks for checking. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Should lategame tanks vet a bit faster?24 May 2018, 12:48 PM Jump back to quoted post24 May 2018, 12:38 PMPuppetmaster Side armour does not exist in the game, only front and rear. Regardless of where it hits physically on the vehicle or tank, it is either considered a front or rear hit. I suggest you read and understand before replaying. I never claimed there is a side armor and I did not provide a side armor value, I wrote front/side and rear/side and provided 2 values which means the front half of the vehicle and rear half of the vehicle. Now, do you actually have anything remotely relative to the topic of thread which is vet speed? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should lategame tanks vet a bit faster?24 May 2018, 12:05 PM Jump back to quoted post24 May 2018, 11:25 AMEsxile I love the inclusion of "side armor" when it serves your argumentation, but only when it does. Armor have little meaning if we don't know who's firing at it with which penetration value. Or do you think a M1 has much more chance to pen a frontal Panther than a pak a frontal Churchill. The only point I have made so far is that their armor values of the vehicles are not the same and thus claim that these vehicles have the same armor values is simply misleading. Now if you want to me clarify what the difference is armor means is that oshteer Pz IV has the same frontal/side armor with Churchill rear/side and even you manage to flank a Churchill with PzIV you still still have trouble penetrating. Pak facing Churchill might penetrate but it will not stop a Churchill, the best counter vs Churchill are stug and JP. So I am not sure what is the Logic behind a Pak vs Churchill and m1 vs Panther. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should lategame tanks vet a bit faster?24 May 2018, 10:44 AM Jump back to quoted post24 May 2018, 10:42 AMEsxile which is more or less the same. Kv-1 has 12.5% more frontal/side armor than Churchill. Churchill has 225% rear/side armor more than PzIV. And according to you its more or less the same. Ok I guess you "the same" has different meaning for you and rest of the world. In: COH2 Balance