Profile of Doggo

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 148

General Information


Thread: Cancer Doctrine has no counter6 Mar 2016, 13:24 PM People just want to steamroll over the British Forces. Before the February commanders, there was no decent British commander; barring Vanguard. The British weren't the dominant faction in CoH1, nor are they in CoH2. Emplacements are required to keep them in the game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: had problems to kill emplacment and counter battery add it 5 Mar 2016, 19:21 PM That free artillery in the base can't hit anything, and even if it does hit, unless its Anvil or Counter Battery, it won't kill anyone. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brit tier 2 idea5 Mar 2016, 19:10 PM This is fine, if an AT Grenade is added or PIATs made to be as accurate as Bazookas/Panzershrecks. Otherwise, Light armour will roll over Brits. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF need non-doc AT Nade for new 222?1 Mar 2016, 22:34 PM People who are suggesting AEC do know, that going for that locks out the Bofors emplacement? Same with asking for Doctrine solutions; basic gameplay mechanics should NOT be found as Doctrine-only or Exclusive. PIATs should work similarly to Bazooka or Panzershreck, or like Panzerfaust. You should not have to attack-ground for them to operate normally. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer Railway Artillery29 Feb 2016, 09:44 AM This does not seem balanced and invalidates the new Emplacements commander. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sim City28 Feb 2016, 21:33 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2016, 01:33 AMRappy You always talk about UKF having been fucked vs OKW before this Sim City doctrine. But the stats show otherwise. I think you are living in a victim fantasy mate. I'll tune my violin for you. Pre-AEC buff (which has now been removed, making it useless) the UKF lost significantly to OPKW. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sim City28 Feb 2016, 21:30 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2016, 09:54 AMIntelligence209 Brace needs to be COMPLETELY removed, even if that calls for a health increase or something to compisate for that. If Brace is removed, Emplacements are going to need, Health and defense buffs to compensate, plus price decrease. Then, Infantry Sections are going to need buffs to be on par with OKW infantry, then, the Churchill nerfs are going to need to be reverted since Emplacements would suck now. Basically, we end up with OST V2.0. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Land mattress damage27 Feb 2016, 19:35 PM Brits needed: effective Garrison clearer and a viable source of artillery. Finally, it has both even if it is overcosted. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sim City27 Feb 2016, 14:00 PM Sounds like people oppose strong defensive play, but love strong offensive play. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Land mattress damage27 Feb 2016, 08:19 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2016, 06:05 AMThamor It has not been nerfed just made more balanced. It was killing OKW Tech3 buildings too easily. So only building damage got nerfed... So it's been nerfed then. I think with the new damage profile they should remove it's fuel cost and lower CP by 1-2 so that it can be relevant before Stuka invalidates it. In: COH2 Balance