Profile of Grim

Jump back to quoted post24 Jan 2019, 09:34 AMhooosh

cheese such as comet blobs, Firefly Wolfpacks and emplacements, Katyusha spam etc. Yes we lost the new players because of these.

Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2019, 00:32 AMMoBo111

And for the bunker point that was brought up in the last few posts... just build an at gun, or use smoke and demo charges and just walk up to it, it's not that difficult, three shots or one little 45 muni boompack and 150 mp and 60 munis are down the drain. Great for stalling, but not good enough to keep a halfways solid player off a point if he is determined to get there.

Jump back to quoted post11 Jan 2019, 18:45 PMTobis

Are paras worth using?
Yes.

Is Airborne worth using?
No.

Jump back to quoted post9 Jan 2019, 15:54 PMn00biE

In all honesty, this has to be the most biased 4v4 balance thread in a long time. Allies have been slightly stronger in team games since the changes to panther accuracy. Before that, it has been allied superior arty spam vs panther spam, as can be seen in older 4v4 tournaments. For the past year, we havent had any 4v4 tournaments except the "4v4 new meta " if i recall correctly. In that tournament allies dominated. And the reason for that was Jackson + Firefly > Panther.

Outside of tournament play, if you want to carry 3 mediocre people to victory, you got to make offensive plays. Bleeding manpower and locking down points is often not enough when facing good opponents. That is the reason, why vetting rocket artillery is so strong if rushed. For the same reason, Units like Brummbaer, USF Sherman, T70, IS2, Curchill AVRE, USF mobile Howitzer are OP as fuck when played properly.

I have seen high level players carry so hard with various USF builds, it all comes down to a l2p issue rather than balance.

Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2019, 13:46 PMDonnieChan

i suggest removing brits completely as they only sklow down and fu ck up this game