Profile of Grim

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1097

General Information


Thread: What if we made the Flame Hetzer a useful unit? 3 Apr 2020, 14:13 PM Happy to give the hetzer a buff if it leads people away from using Grand Offensive and fortifications 24/7.....shit's getting old. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: TDs & AT guns - a change to attack vehicles button3 Apr 2020, 12:41 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Apr 2020, 21:53 PMLoopDloop IMO it'd almost be more confusing that way, since generalist tanks would have a different natural state than TDs. Seems like unnecessary layers of depth added to the UI that would be even more confusing than learning which guns are effective against what. This would also imply that AT guns and TDs are garbage against structures for no other reason than that's how prioritize vehicles works. Of course, I'm not a new player so I might be biased as someone who already understands the game mechanics, but those are my thoughts on that one. It would create no further confusion than the current system of letting a newly built jackson happily blast away at a Pzgren blob. If nothing else AT guns should have this added for quality of life. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Question about 120mm mortar2 Apr 2020, 22:53 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Apr 2020, 19:58 PMLoopDloop 120mm seems useful more for the extra range against buildings than anything else. Being able to shell the building from that much more safety is always nice, gives you more flexibility in where you chose to set up to defend them too. But it takes so LONG to actually deal decent damage that I'd rather just use 2 standard mortars and risk it up close. I like the 120mm but it rarely justifies the investment and popcap. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Airborne Company2 Apr 2020, 22:51 PM I like the idea of adding the support weapons to the beacon as a call-in. Not sure what to add to replace them though. Maybe a smoke barrage like in heavy cav? Not sure what the other slot could be. Side note: I would use recon more tbh but I HATE getting a pak every time I want to get paras. Especially if I want to call them in behind the enemy. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Was DShK overnerfed? 31 Mar 2020, 11:58 AM I'd like to see it arrive a little sooner but otherwise it's solid enough. I'll still take an MG42 over it though. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ditch the Sherman Dozer Attachment31 Mar 2020, 09:40 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2020, 14:18 PMthedarkarmadillo You'll have a hard time getting 85s as usf.... True. One more reason to play soviets. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ditch the Sherman Dozer Attachment28 Mar 2020, 13:33 PM I find the upgrade to be more of a novelty than of any real use. If I was looking for 130 fuel premium mediums I'd just for for T34/85s. Although if it IS removed/nerfed I feel like it's just one more reason to spam jacksons. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remove StormTiger reload debuff？26 Mar 2020, 14:48 PM to be fair, at the moment leaving a decrewed ST for your enemy to capture is a nerf for them most of the time. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: infantry balance24 Mar 2020, 10:29 AM Honestly, seeing who is actually taking the OP seriously is a great filter for future threads. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-152 HE shell range should be reduced?22 Mar 2020, 18:20 PM I'd be happy with them making the ISU152 a dedicated AT unit and buffing/altering towards that. Also, pathing seems REALLY bad for it. Anyone else find that? In: COH2 Balance