|
Game name : Finndeed
16 digit SteamID64: 76561198007338428
Country of residence: UK
Passport emailed: N/A
Placement match availability. timezone: GMT Should be available around 7pm or at the weekends.
|
I would love to do this one! If Hector doesn't mind 
|
You think Cons are okay, want T3 Stugs to beat Comets, and think that the Jackson is great now that it was balanced for the T3 P4. If I shortened the post to calling you an axis fanboi, you probably wouldn't respond constructively to that either.
Using opinion, even opinion polls to determine the direction of balance is a really bad idea. This game had very well balanced win rates before the patch, but wasn't fun with lots of bugs, overpowering indirect fire, and lots of cheese abilities. It's still too early to tell, but I'd bet that once the new meta settles out that it won't be balanced and will be even cheesier. Your suggestions for the next patch won't help that.
Could you please read my posts a bit more closely please. |
Gev43 ppsh are in 3 cp, gev43 at 1, STG dont have CP. Now tell me what price are of this 3 weapons.
For cons price its must be. If cons price was 200, but not same like grens and almost folks. I talk that soviet elite infatry are to expensive and not good (are in docs), that the problem. Cons are not cheap, dont trust in that myth, look at reinforce cost for cons, grens and folks in half of squad and 5/3/4 model.
So all infatry have ablity, rifle nade and faust. Flame nade and faust. Only different its oorah and merge.
And what more expensive unit ppsh or ptrs outfight ? If its work, we will se it, coz top players use meta. Do you see ppsh ?
So if cons are balanced, we must say that somthing are not ? Imo i think big problem are with hight RNG accuracy for them.
I begin talk about MP, coz soviet "based" on MP. Guards need more test but i think that double nerf are to bad. Shocks are still useles.
Jesus man if you cant win with Cons use maxims... Plenty of top players use cons, they just don't expect them to be the best inf in the game like you do. |
Every time someone brings up the cost/perfomance of an bad allied vehicle and points out how it is much too expensive and doesn't do much compared to its axis counterpart, somebody says that you can't compare units in a vacuum or something similar. Examples of this are the M20 that costs 340/70/20 yet can't beat anything more than a kubel. Yet somehow all T4 allied units are supposed to be beatable with Ost T3.
If you could formulate a more coherent point I will be happy to respond more constructively. |
is there a Brit Balance patch in prospect  ?
come on, give us a hint
There will probably be another vote on the official forums and that will determine the next patch's scope.
With the amount of anger at Brits i think we can be sure Brits are up next  |
The Comet has to be the "gentle" nudge for OST to consider teching up and, you know, maybe get a Panther. By nerfing Comet armour you are making Panther even more irrelevant than it already is.
that's what i mean when i say 'Stug's can fight them' so the Comet still kills the stug but the stug has a chance to fend it off...
Panther should be the harder-counter.
ATM stugs literally do not touch the Comet. Remember the Comet can also self-spot, which is fine if you can pen the damn thing in return.
I dont think we have dissimilar ideas here. |
You say penals ?  Problem now that before it was to OP but now, with MP price its a hard, i mean sviet game based on MP.
PPSH work only on some map. Cheap ? Tell me how many cost gevers and STG , in what CP thay are compared to ppsh .
Maybe change cost is a thing.
'gevers and STG' What are these?
Cons aren't meant to be able to go toe to toe with other more expensive and specialized units. Cons ARE cheap and they can have AT nades and Molotov's and can sprint AND merge. They are six man and have doctrinal upgrades which allows them to outfight other MUCH more expensive units if you play it right. The PPSH's with Oorah make them seriously potent. I think cons are one of the best designed and most balanced units in the game; its other over and under preforming units which need adjusting.
I think you are being unfair Vasa. |
Frost talk same, but after few games vs OKW he change his opinion  .
hmm but Cons were never meant to be used in isolation but as supporting units, with maxims or penals or guards or shocks to into fast tanks.
Have you used them with the PPSH upgrade? They are really good and remember they are really cheap...
Would you be okay with them having a performance increase for a cost increase? |
I´m not sarcastic.
Stug needs a nerf, at least slight now. It´ rof is too high right now imo
Ah well i have been saying it for a while, guess just never enough
Well i think you can only nerf the stug if it comes with a nerf to Cromwell and t-34/76. And if you nerf ROF i think you would need to increase its pen... But then why would anyone get a panther...
Maybe it would be better to adjust its vet bonus's so it doesn't become so mental (I might have the vet bonus's wrong i cant remember them) |
0
Finndeed
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
