Profile of Lady Xenarra

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 956

General Information


Thread: Pershing blows - USF Heavy Cavalry21 Oct 2020, 19:01 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2020, 18:47 PMSkysTheLimit This is exactly the problem I have with it. It's not a bad unit, but it's not a good heavy tank because of things like this. Its just not survivable enough for its cost Speed is nice but that's what I have the rest of the US roster for. Literally every vehicle they have besides the dozer shermans is fast and relies on mobility If that's the theme of the faction then so be it, but if that's the case they shouldn't of added a heavy tank in the first place I'm sure they added it because USF players (mains?) complained that there was no US heavy tank and everyone else got one. Speaking of that doc, Rangers day 1 were basically 5 man KCH lol. In fairness, if I see an ZiS/6-lber shooting at my Tiger/KT I usually back off, because sadly Kruupstahl is not how that goes down usually. 57mm depends on whether they switch rounds. Heavies across the board are in need of buffs/reversions imho. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing blows - USF Heavy Cavalry21 Oct 2020, 18:19 PM On the one hand I have a game where my teammate was calling for help vs a Pershing and when I arrived it was vet III from tangling with panthers. ~~Not going to talk about how it swiss cheesed my Jagdtiger in a slug out as that was just RNG.~~ Not sure what was going on in that game. On the other hand can't say I see the Pershing as much more than a cheezeburger-stuffing Comet and target practice vs decent players. A single raketen can scare it off if it misses the first shot. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing blows - USF Heavy Cavalry19 Oct 2020, 17:48 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Oct 2020, 08:30 AMT.R. Stormjäger Exactly, it’s absurd that it should require 2 REs to babysit it all game for repairs. Indeed. I have even seen USF players with Priests sent to fire whilst low on hp. 2 REs is clearly too high a requirement. Pls buff. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing blows - USF Heavy Cavalry19 Oct 2020, 00:42 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2020, 23:19 PMHannibal I was slightly unprecise in the wording here: KT has lower scatter. Meaning although the OHK radius is lower, it should have a higher chance of actually landing its shot. Without calculatung this now completely, I would assume the KT has better OHK potential on full health models because of that. KT is a real beast. Ah okay, that makes sense. Shame that its reduced to a glorified pillbox in that regard lol. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: CoH2: All-Out War Edition - 64bit 18 Oct 2020, 22:25 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2020, 18:02 PMmrgame2 what a strange drop. why sega dont cut a new trailer at least 4k/60fps with max settings. who is this intended for? Probably people stuck home in Lockdown and with a bit of money to spend as they're not going out any more. COH2 remains the premier WWII RTS even after 6 years.....though I do pity the people trying MP from square 1. In: Lobby
Thread: Pershing blows - USF Heavy Cavalry18 Oct 2020, 20:51 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2020, 19:12 PMHannibal While this is true, the King Tiger shoots way more accurately. Plus the mid-far AoE is way way better, so overall this 0,1 m OHK difference will definetely not be felt. KT is great at taking health and models off a squad, somewhere in between the Pershing and ISU. Whilst the accuracy increase is marginal (due to only the 40 vs 45 max range), mid dmg being 56 vs 60 @ 1.25(again marginal) I agree on the far AOE being far superior for wounding. I had not known the far aoe to be so high (8dmg at 1.875[Pz IV] vs 36dmg at 4[KT]). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing blows - USF Heavy Cavalry18 Oct 2020, 18:17 PM While we're at it, the KT's 80dmg aoe kill distance is worse than a pz iv last time I checked: 1.04 vs 1.13. This isn't right, the KT 80 aoe should be larger. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Perfect example of arty dominanz and BS mechanics (4v4)17 Oct 2020, 19:23 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Oct 2020, 03:28 AMSupport Sapper When we're at it, i want to bring up the LEFH's counter battery and british version of it (tho less problematic being timed and muni cost), they are still require close to no input and put intense micro tax on opponents. Ahh yes, the infamous 10% (or something similar) direct hits LEFH CB. Worthless against a Calliope and i’ve yet to meet a decent player whose Sexton/Priests were intimidated by the shells landing around them lol. (2 direct hits for a kill!) I mean sure, when we had Hamburg 4-5 LEFHs even their Priests were getting deleted but come on. Adv Emp really is just a cheese commander who flails in flames against Incendiary Mortar HTs or Feuersturm. Against decent players who mine and protect their mobile arty, Axis don’t have much in the way of reliable counters except LEFH. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Perfect example of arty dominanz and BS mechanics (4v4)16 Oct 2020, 17:59 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2020, 17:05 PMT.R. Stormjäger Imagine not vetoing Hamburger in 4v4. But...it's my favourite 4v4 map...... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: If you think about it sturmpioneers need 2 shreks14 Oct 2020, 20:24 PM I would advise you use a more reliable method of tank killing than double schrecks that doesn't bleed huge manpower. There's the Jagdpz IV which scales to be the best TD in the game, raktenwerfers which still give ppl PTSD with the camo fire/retreat and Pumas for midgame stopping power. In: COH2 Balance