Profile of insaneHoshi

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 911

General Information
Steam: 76561197989687200


Thread: Lol shocks.12 Feb 2017, 12:41 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Feb 2017, 15:40 PMLoopDloop They struggle with vetted assgrens and volks at short range. By struggle you mean they can safely walk up to them and do decent damage? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 39min to bring down one bofors..9 Feb 2017, 21:28 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Feb 2017, 21:40 PMzerocoh AG works pretty bad against emplacements, especially bofors. you need vision to attack otherwise it takes forever to shoot down Yes but AG is better than not shooting it. That's why you always shift queue up an attack ground order after a barrage In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 39min to bring down one bofors..8 Feb 2017, 21:08 PM In the vid the bofors would have been dead at 10 minutes if he queued up an attack ground order. But i kinda agree that the bofors can be bullshit at times. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Debuff for blobs3 Feb 2017, 05:05 AM IMO suppression shouldn't be effected by recieved accuracy modifiers In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What thing that they patched out do you miss the most?3 Feb 2017, 01:56 AM I miss g43 and lmg42 grens In: Lobby
Thread: Poll: The Land Matress26 Jan 2017, 00:55 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Jan 2017, 07:06 AMLoopDloop It can't retreat. Which is why it's so EASY TO STEAL. How does that not make sense? Because you have to somehow get past the entire UKF army to steal it, while dodging or taking zero damage from the LM barrage? And retreat cuts both ways, UKF can't retreat it back to their base, but you can't either. Jump back to quoted post25 Jan 2017, 07:07 AMLoopDloop And this is different than other rocket arty because... Because its much cheaper and requires no tech investment? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF Snares - How to balance?18 Jan 2017, 11:03 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2017, 10:09 AMLatch It's to show they are similar which it does. Killing something roughly 1/3 faster for much cheaper is a weird way to say similar. Either way, that video no where near showed your presumption that shreks are better. From that controlled experiment, yes in that case piats are better? How could you not say that when you video shows that they perform better, in every measure of the word? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF Snares - How to balance?18 Jan 2017, 09:56 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2017, 08:02 AMLatch How can you say Shrecks don't make an impact? That single Shreck has about the same impact as double PIATS, check here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eg7YBF-nJxc This was made before the recent WBP where PIATS now have reduced stats Was this supposed to prove that Shreks were better? Because all it proved was that 2 vet 5 sturms took ~25s to kill a okw p4, and it takes 2 vet 3 sappers ~15s to kill a p4. 600 MP, 180 munitions (shreks) is worse than 420 MP, 160 munitions. I dare say, one could conclude that PIATS seem to be better. Weird eh? Plus you don't take into account that vet 5 should not be compared to vet 3 and piats have 45 range. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF Snares - How to balance?18 Jan 2017, 09:46 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2017, 08:02 AMLatch The rest of the tanks are toss ups and trade offs So you agree that you were originally wrong then? OKW doesn't have better tanks than UKF Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2017, 08:02 AMLatch How can you say Shrecks don't make an impact? That single Shreck has about the same impact as double PIATS, check here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eg7YBF-nJxc This was made before the recent WBP where PIATS now have reduced stats Because Shrek's come in on an expensive 300 MP squad for 90 muni and lock them out of detecting mines, where PIATs come in on a squad that's 210 MP and are pritty damn tough and spammable, unlike the sturmpio. Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2017, 08:02 AMLatch I've never used a rak? Ever? Not even when playing as OKW? Every game I play against OKW if I decrew a rak I take it if I have the chance. Yes I agree, for the high cost of zero MP, the rakken is certainly a cost effective weapon. Also i can see why you think the retreat is so handy, if you're in a position to take one, its a key click away to make it run back to your base. Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2017, 08:02 AMLatch When did I say the rak was better? better AT options, ~~Faust, shreck Mines and~~ rak. Because this form has rules, i say nothing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF Snares - How to balance?18 Jan 2017, 06:51 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2017, 05:23 AMLatch So they don't have better tanks Which OKW tank is superior? AEC is better than the luchs, P4 worse than the crushwell, comet is better than the panther, Churchill Croc is better than flame hetzer, Firefly is better than the jp4 ( JP4 does have better vet). So that leaves what, KT and JT (puma if you want to count that as a tank)? In the majority of the cases, OKWs tanks are not better. Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2017, 05:23 AMLatch shreck + fausts are worse than just Piats? You mean the single shrek that OKW can get? Shreks on sturms never make that big of an impact. Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2017, 05:23 AMLatch Id rather an invisible, retreat-able garrison-able AT gun than the 6PDR but that's my preference. Because you've never used it before and seen how many times it hits fence posts. Plus garrison on it is a noob trap until they fix hold fire and the only reason why retreat is necessary is because it has to get to 30 range to actually hit anything. Better to just have a normal ATgun that can fire from 60 range (from in the FOW) and just reverse if things are getting near. If you think the rakken is the better than the hyper accurate, hyper mobile 6pdr, you are delusional and willfully ignorant. In: COH2 Balance