Profile of Stark

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 626 | Subs: 1

General Information
Timezone: UTC


Thread: British snare problem and potential fixes21 Jun 2018, 12:24 PM Why do you trying to give AT nade to a Tommie squad? They will be too much versatile and dangerous. Huge risk for making them too strong with double bren and bolster - aka another OP unit. Choosing between bolster/nades/bren/AT nade - Why making this game more complicated? There was a good idea to give them to sappers available after a grenade upgrade in HQ. If you wanna make it unique (which i will always support) give them not a snare AT nade but stun nade vs tanks. Something like a target weak point used to do or new implemented USF mines. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: GCS2 Barbarossa faction win rate21 Jun 2018, 07:54 AM Maybe those players should say why they didn't play brits??? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: the cromwell need buffs21 Jun 2018, 07:45 AM Whatever those changes gonna be i just hope it won't make cromwell opieOP again. I had enough playing against double brits cromwell spam couple patches ago. IMO if you wanna improve cromwell you should buff it vet bonuses - not the basic version. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW HMG3419 Jun 2018, 06:39 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Jun 2018, 01:02 AMCieZ ... But if you could, would you change anything in this unit? This unit works, it's used, no1 says it's not but question is it scale well enough compare to other mgs and is it balance? Personally i don't have problem with it but i think i should vet quicker to scale better in time. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pgrens seem like they have been flipped on their head19 Jun 2018, 06:20 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Jun 2018, 18:26 PMthedarkarmadillo That's their flexibility not to mention the ability to transition to emergency AT. Shocks are great at 1 thing pgrens are good at a couple. All I'm saying. If you upgrade them they loose almost all their AI capabilities. So It's like you get a new diffrent unit. As i meansioned before they should get cost decreased to 300mp - currently their AI isn't cost effective, especially vs mid-late game USF and UKF. Btw can anyone knows why the smoke nade was at the end not implemented in a patch live version? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British snare problem and potential fixes19 Jun 2018, 06:07 AM From all those ideas imo snare for sapers after a nade upgrade is the most resonable. Why not move AT Tommies to a T2 and switch them with something else? there was a couple of units that were removed from a game in a beta faze of a game - artillery officer etc Jump back to quoted post19 Jun 2018, 06:05 AMullumulu Hell...why all allie infantery should get the possibilty to deal with infantery AND armor easily? Where is the axis infantery which is good vs both target? why only allie infantery can a-move no-brain-and-skill-need? give a snare abilty to a unit which can also equip handheld AT and anit infantery weapons is a no brainer and totally op. see guards or penals. choose one: - handheld AT and good anti infantery - snare and good anti infantery* --->not both. Yeah, we don't need more guards squads "a" moving on a field and locking tanks even under suppression (one of my favour). That's why sappers sound most resonable unit to carry at nade. After they would get equipt with piats they would loose all their AI capabilities In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Possible new COH3 mechanics19 Jun 2018, 05:45 AM if it is so simple then maybe soome fast patch for coh2? :Kappa In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Possible new COH3 mechanics18 Jun 2018, 15:27 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jun 2018, 15:14 PMGI John 412 Or instead, units cannot target units that are behind a larger unit. That way MGs cannot shoot “through” a tank or AT guns targeting a tank that is behind another tank. This would open up lots of options for combined arms tank play and the use of rifle grenades, mortars and other forms of light indirect fire to counter it by targeting units behind taller units. technicly tanks like KT, IS-2, even p4 or t34 etc should be a sight-blocker. Infantry should be invisible behind it In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Map Patch for the Summer Patch17 Jun 2018, 11:27 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Jun 2018, 08:02 AMLegioxRoma this! I'm speaking just about 2v2 where i use to play: 1) Eindhoven Country was an amzing map, it would be cool to see it again. 2) Ettelbruck is just bad designed. It designed for hold on and arty spam and for 2v2 is just a pain. It might work in 3v3 coz different gamestyle from players. 3) Char'kov must be redesigned or removed..if u start on north side and u gonna play vs a same equal opponent skill u will lose at 100% coz ur fuel it's damn hard to hold compared to south start. 4) Moskow's maps: also if after the DPB redesign they become better they still lack on north side making to hard winning compared to starting from south. Both maps since years are always veto and as i see in WhiteFlash's Company of Heroes 3 isnt only me to veto those maps. My 2cents from a 2v2 addicted guy +1 and my 2 cents i will add later In: News
Thread: Possible new COH3 mechanics15 Jun 2018, 12:06 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Jun 2018, 11:53 AMblvckdream Tank moving slowly forward while infantry is following in green cover behind it. Accually currently there is a mechanic that you can hide your infantry and get green cover behind a tank - while stationary (even light vehicule like a p2). Thing is that no1 uses it becouse to keep your tank alive and effective you have to be in consta move therefor is no place for this feature In: Scrap Yard