Profile of Crystal

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 97

General Information


Thread: Bofors opinion poll31 May 2016, 19:17 PM Yeah the real problem si the mortar pit, not really the Bofors imo. Excellent range, excellent RoF, no fuel cost etc. A simple way to balance that thing would be remove the brace on mortar pit maybe ? Not an optimal balance i guess, but at least it's simple. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Skins - winter in summer31 May 2016, 10:11 AM Jump back to quoted post31 May 2016, 09:43 AMSchmitz I guess all this does is beg the question: Why desert skins in a game which takes place entirely in Europe? In: Lobby
Thread: Ostheer: Tiger or Panther?30 May 2016, 10:44 AM Yeah i guess the Tiger would be better, because including the cost of the Panther and the tech it require, we have more or less the cost for a Tiger. But this one is better to deal with infantry and as good as the Panther against vehicles. ( And it's a call-in ) The only con is that it's a doctrinal unit but so many good commanders got it ... And also in mobility, Tiger isn't the best, but you must support it so it's not really a problem. In: Lobby
Thread: Do you use captain speed boost for building things?29 May 2016, 17:06 PM No. Better move him to the front, for anti-tank support. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Bofors opinion poll29 May 2016, 07:21 AM Jump back to quoted post29 May 2016, 00:00 AMhubewa IMO, take out the indirect fire ability and it will be perfectly fine. I have no idea why Relic decided to add that. Because, at the moment, without it, the Bofors is totally useless and unplayable. If you remove this ability, you need to seriously buff others stats ( like range first ), or seriously reduce its cost because it would be easily destroyed by any AT gun. ( which is an >Anti-Tank< gun, not an Anti-Emplacement gun ) We talk about balancing here, not about murdering a unit because you don't want to play against. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bofors opinion poll28 May 2016, 17:59 PM You're in your right In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bofors opinion poll28 May 2016, 17:56 PM Maybe it needs a slight adjustment, like a small diminution of the rate of fire as said above. But in my opinion, the Bofors is practically balanced at the moment. It is far from what it was at the release of the UKF lol. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sexton suck once again (1000+ thread created to suxton)27 May 2016, 20:58 PM The Sexton's buff isn't a bad thing since it's sharing the same commandant of the Valentine which is the 2nd worst tank of the game ( can we even call it a "tank" ? ). The first, obviously, being the Sexton. This poor commander ... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Skins - winter in summer27 May 2016, 20:53 PM The Fox Company camo is real? With the blue and yellow stripes across the rear end? That surprises me. I saw a picture of it, and it surprised me too ! That's why i remember it But it's difficult to find specific camouflages of Ww2 on Internet. At least i don't really know where to search. For UKF i only know the Olive Drab camouflage, The Desert Yellow ( who don't ? ) and the famous Counter Scheme mostly used by the Desert Rats. ( Even though it got this famous color mistake ) In: Lobby
Thread: Churchill is garbage27 May 2016, 20:28 PM Jump back to quoted post27 May 2016, 19:58 PMStug life dude look at what i responded and stop posting he just said Churchill has a worst gun than medium tank Yeah and the Cromwell's gun is not as good as it seems to be. Try to shoot at the frontal plate of a Pz.IV and count how many times it will ricochet. Yeah, a lot. The main gun of the Cromwell is by far his speed and mobility, rather than the gun itself. Churchill don't have this, so his gun becomes worse than the Cromwell's one. It's not really complicated to understand, i swear. In: COH2 Balance