Profile of Zyllen

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 770

General Information


Thread: Jackson spam31 May 2015, 12:43 PM Sending tigers and panthers against the jackson is stupid. they have enough penetration and will treat the both tanks as oversized p4's. to counter glass cannons you need a glass cannon of your own. Buffing the stug back to its original purpose would fix this as well as making tier 3 valid in the face of the callin meta In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW Op.... really?30 May 2015, 11:07 AM Keeping the " future " patches in mind its best to put the obers in the med bunker and reduce the mp to 320. common 50 mp for a beefier gren is nuts. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer's Panzer IV vs Sherman/T34 Costs 9 May 2015, 22:51 PM If you look at the differences between the varied tanks, the are not that different. what they share 1 thing in common: callins will fucking wipe the floor with them. For the usf this isnt a problem because the best AT unit is in the same tier 3 and doesnt require any further teching when the callins arrive. The soviets and ost do not have this advantage and its a game losing decesion to go tier against callins. not a single medium tank needs buffs its the cllins that need very hefty nerfs of 4-5 extra cp's Tier 3 Soviets should be cheaper . Read the topic starter he shows us that Tier 3 Soviets should be cheaper As i already explained to you he has calculated it wrong and soviet tier is cheaper in both mp and fuel In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Op.... really?8 May 2015, 19:45 PM Obers last patch where fine until they reached critical mass where they started wiping squads in seconds . By reducing the power of the obers relic did a fine thing allowing allied players to react. But reducing the cost efficiency was an idiotic move. Obers need to cost 300 mp. why? Because the okw really needs decent AI when they arrive as volks are completely incapable with dealing with soviet elite or upgrades rifles and struggle against base allied squads. the okw still has a that ammo and fuel penalty. okw their fore need to be better then allied counterparts. This is the only infantry aquired through teching In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer's Panzer IV vs Sherman/T34 Costs 5 May 2015, 12:47 PM Jump back to quoted post5 May 2015, 11:59 AMRMMLz Well, I have to disagree with you on this one. Ostheer's T3 is a lot more viable than Soviets T3, and I think we do agree that Ostheer's T3 doesn't have any problem versus USF (at least on paper). Against Soviets, things are different yes, but still a vet 3 P4 is A LOT MORE intimidating than a vet 3 T34. I know, they should be because P4s are more expensive but the difference is greater than the actual fuel cost if you ask me. OKW's puma is ok IMO, specially with the 5 vet system, and the utility it has. But you don't expect the puma to counter an IS2 do you? PS: That video does not prove anything. That was just pure bad luck. I'm up for some RNG adjustments but come on, that doesn't prove that P4s are 100% useless versus IS2. All that being said, the call in meta should be fixed. starting with some adjustments to stock units. That was not bad luck at all. even against the rear the p4 only has 50 % of penetrating and dont get me started about the is2 front armour. technically the t-34 has a better change against the tiger then the p4 has against the is2. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer's Panzer IV vs Sherman/T34 Costs 5 May 2015, 12:42 PM Jump back to quoted post5 May 2015, 12:40 PMsome one So anyone knows when relic gonna decrease the cost of Soviets Tier 3? Not ever because the soviets start with more fuel. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer's Panzer IV vs Sherman/T34 Costs 5 May 2015, 12:40 PM Nothing wrong with either the p4 or t-34. The problem is that their are no decent TD's in either tier 3 that can deal with the callin heavies. and the p4 has no chance in hell against the 85/e8/soviet sherman. The reason you see sherman a lot more often is because of the jackson. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Let's talk about Volksgrenadiers4 May 2015, 20:47 PM Jump back to quoted post4 May 2015, 16:41 PMSpecialka Maybe because they are not there to deal with IA? As OKW, you have luch/FlakHT/Obers to deal with your AI needs. Then obers should be brought back pre nerf. Its clear that the okw infantry is not capable of standing up to the soviet and usf infantry. or we spread the buff out and do not lump everything on the obers. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The OKW conundrum4 May 2015, 10:42 AM Jump back to quoted post4 May 2015, 01:59 AMVuther Because it's totally useless to be able to get an artillery vehicle or long-range tank destroyer later...try going without AT guns as Allies before you declare backteching as OKW is frivolous (and of course even if you don't build anything from the building, the building still heals+reinforces/repairs/giant flak gun). The only trucks the okw needs are the med truck and the flak truck. Mechanised has a very poor units selection at the moment. lol track and lol puma. walking stuka is good but why squander the fuel and dont get a ST ? And LT plus major also has everything it needs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The OKW conundrum4 May 2015, 01:52 AM Jump back to quoted post4 May 2015, 01:24 AMAladdin It's simple. Haven't u noticed higher skilled players do not play okw in tourney anymore! Ost used to be the weakest faction but no OKW is not just the weakest faction but unplayable against players of the same or even lower skill. Everyone knows when u play okw u have no chance against a soviet players who knows what he's doing. See how guard mortar is now popular Yeah hooray for meta callin. You know i predicted that nerfing the obers would eb the final nail in the coffer for the okw. They have no advantages at all any longer and still crippled by the fuel and ammo penalty. way to go relic. In: COH2 Balance