Profile of Zyllen

Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2016, 16:48 PMRocket

No. You could clear buildings easily with sturms alone before this whole lack of building clearing is/was bullshit. Also now with new kubel it + sturms easily clear buildings. Now add incendiary nade and you can't use buildings at all to fight okw they just win every time and building fighting has been huge part of met/most maps. Just like how okw whiners managed to get relic to give them a super P4, again bullshit.

Also a commander was added like USF where you can get flamers and in city maps strums with flamers are pretty insane. enough that it can make this doctrine worth it.

Most the time the incendiary nade is not even used for building clearing its used to plan a retreat path wipe or insta gib models or just to make you have to move out of cover which equals auto wins on engagements most of the time and because they can easily afford to throw them out like fuckin Halloween candy.

There was a reason this faction was missing those things because all factions are missing something other than okw now thanks to the over whelming I heart OPkw community.

USF have to tech to nades it expensive to tech them expensive to throw them, every nade thrown the slower you get weapon upgrades. One usf nade does not clear the mg out of the building takes two.

Cannot fight in building against okw now, but you know its fine that they can.

Volks are cancer right now all you have to do is simply keep them alive thats it and they will eventually vet steam roll because they just don't take dmg from anything and because of that always out push you on vps.

edit* forgot to mention that incendiary nades also make you get out of garrsion and also DENY you to be able to garrison the building again. Unlike usf nades you easily just jump out, jump back in unless its an mg of course.

Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2016, 01:54 AMDullahan

It's pretty great on pgrens since it's great on the move + up close with pairs well with the mp44's.

On grenadiers it comes down to preference.

Jump back to quoted post4 Apr 2016, 03:51 AMthedarkarmadillo

the issue isnt that the okw have the flame nade, its that VOLKS have said flame nade... y'know the cheap infantry that also get the best AT in the game and a vet requirement reducer for 90mu? there are also reduced suppression bulletins for volks....
the result is a cheap, relatively durable squad that can counter tanks and garrisons while being no shirk in infantry combat as well... its a unit that can do it all (which is why its blobbed, same as rifles)

if it had gone on sturms, there would have been a garrison counter that was available just as early but also require more than one unit to counter most enemies
and for no extra cost outside teching up no the less

Jump back to quoted post4 Apr 2016, 05:25 AMAustralian Magic

We had eastern front and then Relic introduced western front.
Everything is fine.

If you want Japs, you need pacific front, not Europe.