Profile of Banillo

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 134

General Information


Thread: Royal Engineers are op19 May 2016, 10:00 AM they are 40 muni each, anybody can take tham in team games (soviets and usf) they do 60% damage on deflect just use attack ground and you will take out tanks no problems at all (at least the heavy ones) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Royal Engineers are op17 May 2016, 14:36 PM https://www.coh2.org/topic/40161/falls-current-performance-replay/page/1#post_id393738 here is a replay how op REs are. no changes were done to falls or REs since then. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Royal Engineers are op17 May 2016, 14:30 PM Jump back to quoted post16 May 2016, 22:28 PMDonnieChan https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198049062069 <-- not a single brit game when i play allies 4v4 i play with brits. i know this from playing with them and aginst them. if the stats are right and and royal engineers can simply walk in to grens and win they are op In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why do brits have weapon racks?15 May 2016, 20:17 PM Jump back to quoted post15 May 2016, 20:08 PMFiresparks the two howitzer require munition to use, that's not free. The british get a munition based off map in place of the rocket artillery for the soviet and axis instead of giving mp or mp and fuel and popcap you spend 45 munitions per usage, i think it makes up for the lack of rocket arty The howizers being bad without some doctrines is an other question In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why do brits have weapon racks?15 May 2016, 15:02 PM Jump back to quoted post15 May 2016, 14:44 PMofield Late game non-doc arty unit? you mean the two howizer you get for free with tech? (they are not great or bad but still an arty that can be good wit some commanders) or the mortar pit witch can cover like half of some maps with no proper counter? and i can add the best off maps in the game In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why do brits have weapon racks?15 May 2016, 14:26 PM I get it why the usf have them since they dont have any heavy tanks. A weaker at gun, a weaker hand held at. no sniper etc. But why brits? what drawback do they have that needs to be compensated with double brens? I dont see any In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Royal Engineers are op15 May 2016, 14:17 PM Their dps is higher then other units dps of similar cost or role like the ostherr pios Their flamethrower does more damage vs bulidings then other flamethrowers In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why Ostheer is currently not much fun in my opinion9 May 2016, 20:51 PM There is a reason why the puma and stug e are the most popular doctrines in high lvl 1v1. Top players are forced to go for them not cuz they want to. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Is the Bofors AA gun bugged ? 26 Apr 2016, 10:29 AM yea, it shoots faster that hte animation is showing it and there is hardy any reload on the unit, it just shoots and shoots and shoots In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Feuerstrum and Overwatch doctrines need changes24 Apr 2016, 13:40 PM These premium commanders are seriously up Compared to the two new usf and uk commanders they are bad in design and function thats the reason why they see no use at all. Goliath gets detected before it can get close to do any damage. Just send inf on attack move and they will kill it from safe range Foward recivers cant be used as intended because you are forced to build your trucks in your base cuz of the allied mobile and static arty and offmaps witch can take them out with ease Flares justa bad copy of the soviet flare witch can only be used on points and do no damage Sector assault 250 muni for an arty that can hit nothing, and it even has a warning plane. The pinning plane is the only good thig about this. Recoup loses is not needed in a faction that flaots mp Hetzer is up and need some buffs since its the selling ponit of this doctrine. Stuka offmap is overpriced since it cost 200 muni and does way less damage then the other offmaps with lower price. In: COH2 Gameplay