Profile of Vuther

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Winter Balance Preview Changelog6 Dec 2016, 04:09 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Dec 2016, 04:05 AMZombiFrancis Hurting vehicles? Yeah, I personally never really had a problem vetting with Pumas since they can kite mediums easily if you have to. AEC would definitely be on stricter timing with the basic 40 range though. In: Lobby
Thread: Hotchkiss5 Dec 2016, 22:09 PM Tobis right now In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.1 Update5 Dec 2016, 21:00 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2016, 20:52 PMMistah_S Smith, I would just like to take this time and publicly thank you for putting all this effort in keeping a 10 year old game alive and well. It's people like you that keep me coming back to this community You had me worried about the passage of time for a second there! CoH2's only a 3 year-old game so far. In: Lobby
Thread: Kyle wants feedback on the PIV5 Dec 2016, 02:57 AM I forgot it until ya'll mentioned it too to be honest In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Kyle wants feedback on the PIV5 Dec 2016, 01:57 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2016, 01:08 AMMr. Someguy Isn't the Greyhound complete shit though? Aside from the crutch it's squad-wipe gimmick ability. Maybe he means it should be complete shit But probably not In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.1 Update4 Dec 2016, 19:04 PM ...And don't call me Shirley. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.1 Update4 Dec 2016, 00:07 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2016, 23:50 PMRappy And I think it's a bit much to say received accuracy is a garbage stat for long range infantry. Just because they are optimised for long range, doesn't mean that every battle actually goes like this. Opponent squads close distance and received accuracy is anything but garbage then. You correctly identified the close quarters flamers as OP for long range penals, but you can't see how received accuracy benefits a likewise long range squad. He probably means in relative terms - e.g. if your long-range squad could have only better accuracy or received accuracy, it should take accuracy every time to shoot down close-range enemies before they can get closer and justifiably out-DPS the long-range one. So something like "Double M1919A6 Rifles' vet 3 RA is pretty broken, but if they had an equal value of that RA in accuracy instead it'd be game-shattering!" In: Lobby
Thread: Kyle wants feedback on the PIV3 Dec 2016, 10:29 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2016, 09:28 AMCrumbum The task of what? Carrying the usf late game? At this time usf late game was notoriously bad but it wasn't specifically because of the Sherman, it was a number of factors and units which contributed. Overall the Sherman filled its role as a medium tank quite well. 'Twas always pretty decent, constantly miles better than the 34/76 for 99% of its life, but its weakness in the AT regard was a compound to the problem to USF's ability for AT late-game (and then they didn't necessarily need it if they just played keep-away from the big cats and got lucky wipes ). They definitely don't need the Sherman for that with the state of the 57mm ATG, Jackson and Zookas right now, though I would rather the Sherman's AP shell at least stay effective enough such that flanking heavies is considered worthwhile for it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.1 Update3 Dec 2016, 09:25 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2016, 09:23 AMEsxile Are OKW or Ostheer able to deploy those light tanks between 0 and 5 minutes? no. So what other purposes than extending T1 play does have PTRS on Penals? You can still unlock atnade, deploy cons and Hourraatnade whatever light tank you see with your T1. Yeah, I personally have no problem with the current options. Feels like there's plenty of time to backtech to T2 or grab RPG-43s to me. I'm just telling you right now the entire idea behind the addition means slowing it in the manner you state will never happen before the upgrade being removed will be. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.1 Update3 Dec 2016, 09:06 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2016, 08:33 AMEsxile Make the Penal PTRS upgrade requiring an additional building (T2/T3), and you can even increase a little its performance. Otherwise people will simply spam Penals, get half of them PTRS and wait till IS-2/ISU or M4c sherman spam. The point of the PTRS upgrade is give the tier some anti-(light)tank capability without needing another tier. While I personally think it's fine now anyway, I can assure you the options for the PTRS upgrade are either anything but what you're suggesting, or not existing at all. In: Lobby