Profile of SkysTheLimit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Improved postmatch stats14 Jan 2021, 20:07 PM I'm sure this has been talked about before, but is it possible for us to get accurate damage numbers after the match? Right now I assume it's the XP value of the damage done. It would be much better if it were the actual damage On a side note it would be nice if "wipes" were also reported in the postmatch. Like how many squads lost, how many tanks lost, etc. Rather then lumping individual models and tanks together as "units lost" In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviet tech change suggestion13 Jan 2021, 20:50 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jan 2021, 20:35 PMPip Personally I still think a guards variant (With button and PTRS) would be preferable to Penals with PTRS and Satchels... Which it probably should be anyway, so I think that's okay. Guards are more expensive, arrive a little later, etc. But elchinos ptrs penals and guards are also different enough that there's not too much overlap. Guards are more versatile. Their AT is less potent on its own, but button+ something else is great. Especially button + AT satchel (very satisfying) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet tech change suggestion13 Jan 2021, 20:11 PM For the 4 ptrs penals. If it's too oppressive against light vehicles, make the 4th one (or even 3rd and 4th) be locked behind t4? Upgrade price around 80 muni Or maybe split the upgrade, 60mu for 2 ptrs and AT satchel, 20-40 for two more, after t4 built In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion13 Jan 2021, 15:47 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jan 2021, 15:09 PMKatitof I am very sorry for overestimating your ability to divide 1 by a half or multiply 1 by one and a half. I'm not talking about finding their new target size/incoming damage values you clown. I'm talking about supporting your claim that vet 3 7 man cons have less survivability then that suggestion That requires a lot more than multiplying or dividing 1 number by another. You also need to clarify against which weapons you're talking about... Which we both know you didn't do Jump back to quoted post13 Jan 2021, 15:09 PMKatitof Now you went completely off the rails and are arguing for the sake of arguing. So you won't answer the question. Got it And you accusing anyone of "arguing for the sake of arguing" is hilarious In: COH2 Balance
Thread: End Game report13 Jan 2021, 14:40 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jan 2021, 14:14 PMVipper Damage is not very accurate but it helpful. I would like to see this fixed although it might be intentional. The actual damage numbers are preferable. I would think it's especially better for newer players I remember being very confused when I first started caring about unit stats In: Lobby
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion13 Jan 2021, 14:14 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jan 2021, 08:05 AMKatitof I did. But it was so simple I didn't felt the need to share. LOL sure dude Even if I believed you that just makes you a massive hypocrite. You regularly demand that people show their numbers... Jump back to quoted post13 Jan 2021, 08:05 AMKatitof so I have no idea what you're trying to do here at this point. Really? Cause I made it pretty simple for you: Why do you think the idea is silly? It's been done before Grens lost their RA bonus in exchange for damage resistance. This is an RA penalty in exchange for damage resistance. Aside from the numbers, tell us why you think that concept is silly. Not sure what you don't understand here, just explain your opinion better... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion12 Jan 2021, 23:47 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2021, 23:18 PMKatitof You can do the math yourself, one is silly but there is exchange So you didn't do any math yet either? I said I don't know about the numbers but the general idea could work (it's been done before) You specifically compared the survivability to vet 3 7 man cons. If you're gonna do that, you should show the math. Or at least explain why it's silly... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion12 Jan 2021, 23:10 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2021, 23:07 PMKatitof I'm assuming that he doesn't want to make the unit much more durable at vet0 then vet3 7 man cons, but I've seen worse suggestion from axis only crowd as well. Can you show me how you get those numbers from the percentage he gave? Legit don't know In my head it looks like the Rak becomes super easy to hit from any range with small arms, but takes less damage In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion12 Jan 2021, 23:04 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2021, 23:02 PMKatitof would become undecrewable by infantry as accuracy over 100% doesn't do anything. That would be -50% RA, not +50% Unless im mistaken hes suggesting making their target size larger in exchange for damage resistance. Just like vet 3 grens Yes the accuracy over 100% is useless, but it's not like it was 100% before..... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion12 Jan 2021, 23:00 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jan 2021, 21:46 PMStug life mhhh what about : when set up raketn gets + 40% damage restiance and + 50% RA ? I'm not good enough at math to check those numbers but I see the idea you're going for. Could work, similar spirit to the gren vet 3 changes In: COH2 Balance