its is a nice flanker and is a more popular tank than comet...even the best player build mostly the cromwell over the comet.
Why? because it has nice speed, accuracy on the move, is cheap and is a good wolfpack tank.
That's rather comet's fault though. And OP made a comparison between cromwell and p4, which is more relevant
I'm starting to realise that this forum is filled with fanatical anti axis aggresive allied fanboys. Also stop using "Wehraboo". It's not a word. Check the dictionary.
I play from Moscow and sometimes get huge lag when I get matched with players from Far East Asia. Could be your case as well depending on where you live and what time you play
What if UKF had regular mortar team but which was able to garrison trenches with trade-off bonuses and penalties like more protection at the price of reduced range/RoF.
Moreover, as someone mentioned, UKF did have a theme of playing defensively but this style is simply not applicable in reality since such turtling is easily punished by Axis wide arsenal indirect fire (with the exception of the time period when emplacements spam was a thing but that is a thing of a past now): OST have good regular mortars, mortar HT, OKW have ISG which outrange mortar pits, stukas, and both have leigs which outrange sexton