Profile of Robbie_Rotten

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 412

General Information


Thread: Relic must act !!! OKW need tone down & Brtis need buffs5 Dec 2015, 19:20 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2015, 17:54 PMNEVEC British emplacements need heavy hp buff, volksgrenadiers destroy you in early game and skilled luchs use = gg. Thats a really worthless argument. Skilled anything usage = gg Skilled light vehicle usage in general is GG. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: To Abandon or not to Abandon4 Dec 2015, 14:40 PM From someone who watches more than plays, I like it because it can really make a game interesting to watch. However I fully understand why it is frustrating to play against, having won and lost games to it as well. I realize "it tells a story" isn't a great argument, but hey. I wouldn't change it, I would just like to see the vehicle immobilized. This way it isn't as easy to hop in and drive away. As others were saying in chat, it becomes like a minigame and an optional objective. Having it immobilized would punish over extension into base sectors while making it a pretty unattractive target in the middle of the battlefield. Right now RNG is really all that separates this game from other RTT games out there, so I am against outright removing all RNG elements from the game. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: No-Teching required M4C TrollRolfstomping2 Dec 2015, 00:00 AM People in this thread saying that 5m4cs is not that strong have clearly never seen Cpt. Molo use them. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF lack of indirect, building counters and map balance6 Nov 2015, 21:12 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Nov 2015, 21:01 PMferwiner Yeah, there is no real reason why british nade upgrade should be so costly. Apart from that they are ok though. I am assuming it is expensive to balance out T3 being so cheap. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Centaur3 Nov 2015, 14:52 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 07:15 AMvietnamabc Centaur should have a reuduction in cost, I think 80 fuel is right with their current level of performance. Eh, that would make it come out almost a minute faster. It already comes out at an extremely fast 11-12 minutes. You would have to make T3 more expensive. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Good fix on bombing run not killing base halftracks.3 Nov 2015, 06:05 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 05:14 AMkitekaze You asked me to read, which I did. And the OFFICIAL patch notes don't say anything about changing it to save buildings. Don't get your panties in a twist just because one dev seems to think otherwise. Anyone with a brain could have told you that changing the AOE wasn't going to stop buildings from being destroyed. (It is 100% to do with the pattern the bombs fall in). In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Good fix on bombing run not killing base halftracks.3 Nov 2015, 03:30 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 03:15 AMkitekaze Next time, go search the forum before claiming something. http://www.coh2.org/topic/43508/patch-notes-29-oct/post/425152 Just because brad says something doesn't make it so. The devs say lots of stuff that is simply nonsense or doesn't fit in with what the game actually is. something something shocks in an m3 The actual patch note is: "Artillery Update Air Superiority Previously the huge blast radius of these bombs made it very difficult for players to dodge. AOE Radius of bombs reduced from 10 to 5" There is no dodging something with a static emplacement. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Good fix on bombing run not killing base halftracks.3 Nov 2015, 03:05 AM They never claimed the nerf was to protect buildings? As others have said, it appears to be intended. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Yay. Axis team game is hopeless now.3 Nov 2015, 02:56 AM This thread. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISG counters?2 Nov 2015, 04:59 AM Royal Artillery Regiment with anvil. an almost 100% chance to destroy the gun with airburst shells and you can fire it into fog of war. Severely underrated commander. In: COH2 Gameplay