Profile of thekessvn

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 109

General Information


Thread: USF Pathfinder spam is too efficient (2v2)10 Apr 2022, 13:18 PM and again, pios + gren + MG42 or Volk + kubel + sturm have more tactical power than RE + rifle + rifle. 3rd rifleman would meet 2nd Gren/MG/volk. And thing is: If you mirco well, you win the engagement with high cost. You miss mirco, you lost all. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Greyhound question10 Apr 2022, 13:05 PM Greyhound is 222 with enough AT power. Problem is the timelime too late and a doctrine is downgraded airbone. In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: USF Pathfinder spam is too efficient (2v2)7 Apr 2022, 15:13 PM Because current game state is A move long range fight. That why a offendsive recon like LJI, path better than another. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 76mm Sherman and M4C's AP shell needs a small buff I think6 Apr 2022, 12:24 PM Mechanize would be OK IF: - Give back bulldozer. - recall ROF nerf, If not, buff MG hull, AP shell anti inf power. WC-51 completely nerfed, cal rifleman balanced, combine arm rework which is harder to work in 1v1 and teamgame. Like everyone said, why bother a m4 76mm when it cant be unity ?. Why bother M4 75mm when it cant update bulldozer. Why bother picking mechanize because in the end M36 is still best solution. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Pathfinder spam is too efficient (2v2)6 Apr 2022, 11:58 AM Path is fine to befair. Problem is most of teamgame map is long range fight. "Why not using path like A move Gren ?" > this is how teamgame think. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 76mm Sherman and M4C's AP shell needs a small buff I think6 Apr 2022, 10:33 AM Please dont distract people. We are talking about M4 76 and it whole doctrine. Ground pounded a whole doctrine because of competive meta is toxic move. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 76mm Sherman and M4C's AP shell needs a small buff I think1 Apr 2022, 09:38 AM > OverNerf WC 51. > Rework combine arm (which is effect 2 doctrine as same time) become a complitcated ability so nobody bother to click it anyway. > Overnerf M4 76/M4 Bulldozer for no reason. But hey, they give Weh a Okw Pz4 . Bring M36 into table dont change a fact that M4 76mm is overnerf. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is Vickers K moving accuracy is really 60%?15 Mar 2022, 14:30 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Mar 2022, 14:27 PMVipper Calculation of DPS was 5 entities x 80 HP x 1 target size total HP 400 divided by time to kill and then by 2 for two weapons. As I posted in post 22 in the moving calculation it seems I missed the division by 2 and that explains it. The 0.25 moving modifier seems correct. Nice find. " I suggest you test yourself but I suggest you use ability to call in the raid squad and the upgrade to get Vickers K to be on the safe side." LMAO In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is Vickers K moving accuracy is really 60%?15 Mar 2022, 14:11 PM OK, now we can confirm Vicker K has only 25% moving acc ? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pioneers vs Rear Echelon28 Jan 2022, 16:32 PM Consider RE spam is a thing, Would it be better than 2016 version ?. Also when you lose one, Would you want to pay 200mp for sweepr squad ?. Yet need to pay 100-120 ammo for combat duty ? And again, RE reinfor cost is higher than normal engineer. .... In: COH2 Balance