Profile of Blendersching

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 9

General Information


Thread: Captain fuel cost7 Oct 2014, 18:42 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Oct 2014, 16:05 PMVolsky Add an extra squad member and three more Thompsons to the Captain and just call him a Ranger squad pls. Relic, Rangers pls. Gib naow. Oh yes, I miss vCoH Rangers. They were badass. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Captain fuel cost6 Oct 2014, 18:57 PM 'cause Captain Nixon likes his fuel. Didn't any of you watch your Band of Brothers? Duh. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: RELIC: how about an update_news_something3 Oct 2014, 09:07 AM The sense of entitlement in this thread is quite strong o.O Jesus, critizising is fine and dandy and certainly correct in this case, but some people here should make some effort to not sound like spoiled brats. In: Lobby
Thread: win-lose-ratio from 15.9. - 25.9.2014 + much more28 Sep 2014, 16:12 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Sep 2014, 14:07 PMCruzz Because this is top-200 only, they're getting their wins off lower ranks, especially axis in teamgames where the gap between games played is absolutely huge between axis top-200 and allies top-200. Ah I see, thanks. But then this statistics doesn't say very much, e.g. since slightly more people usually search games as axis, the top 200 of axis will be matched more often against allied players of lower skill while allied top two hundred will have an opponent of equal skill waiting in line more often, making stomps more often for top 200 axis players than vice versa. The statistic should be filtered to count only games against other top 200 players. Of course we wouldn't have this problem if mirror matches were allowed (screw historical acurateness, we already have USF fighting against the OKW in the east, Soviets in France and so on). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: win-lose-ratio from 15.9. - 25.9.2014 + much more28 Sep 2014, 14:02 PM Probably I am not seeing something, but how can every faction have a win ratio of above 0.5? The sum of the ratios should balance out, shouldn't it? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Patch is up, Kubel is slightly nerfed25 Sep 2014, 20:55 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Sep 2014, 20:46 PMEsxile Kubel still too powerfull for USF early game. Do we need to wait 2 more weeks to have something barely balance? I mean I don't need to play 10 games, first OKW players I meet and Kubel push, it took me 10 minutes to kill it, thanks god around rank 500 as USF you still meet noob OKW players that are unable to micro anything that isn't OP like the Kubel. Come on, this is a joke that patch... I dunno...it barely suppresses anymore and its damage got reduced by a lot. I think it's fine now. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch is up, Kubel is slightly nerfed25 Sep 2014, 17:51 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Sep 2014, 17:44 PMKronosaur0s Omg only the kubel needed tweaking. -Resources Munition rate from 100% to 80% The Allied Tear Effort has proven victorious once again. Just kidding, I think it should be ok, as it was OKW had a tad too much munitions. You rarely had to make meaningful decisions with your munition spending, which is weird considering they are the faction that should feel most strapped for ressources. In: Lobby
Thread: It's time to nerf OKW late game24 Sep 2014, 16:16 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Sep 2014, 16:09 PMQueenRatchet123 Nope, you're still there. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Patch September 9th, 20149 Sep 2014, 19:21 PM A lot of decent changes, and after two games I just want to express how happy I am that they finally fixed weapon team positioning. My machine gun teams were driving me mad with them never facing where I wanted them to face. Hooray!! In: Lobby