Profile of Beinhard

Con heavy start requires a lot of micro, and youre commander picks has to suplement your BO

- Lend Lease
- Advanced Warfare Tactics
- Guard motor heavy tactics/Shock Rifle
- Partysaaaaners

Usually my BO is 4x Cons, molly, medics AT nade into T2 for an ATG or Maxim (depends on commander pick)

Molly is useful to clear out those early game rush mgs from buildings, as you will use your engis to side cap and mine.

AT-nade always comes in handy as a fast luch/222 is exspected.

I tend to go T3 to get either an early T70 or Su-76 depending on my current situation, usually I tend to go for the SU-76 if the axis has kept his fuel the whole game and no light mechs. T70 if i've rekt him and kept his fuel for the entire game.

If i skip T2 and T3 i play lend lease, and will just spam M4Cs and rely on mines and AT-nades as I stall towards the shermans. The Dhsk with AP rounds can screw over Luchs and 222 if theyre hit by a mine/at-nade.

Whole point with cons spamming is to gain early map control and deny him fuel, usually I tend to swarm his side and use 3 Cons squads there, while my engis + 1 squad is capping my side. Never pick "un-fair" engagements, and if youre caught in the open try to move away or just retreat.

Against OST sniper I tend to do a large flank, where i use all my 4 cons squads + 1 engis to encircle the ost players position and bait the sniper + mg42 with one squad, while the others move in from the sides.

If you want to go full troll go defensive tactics on urban maps and watch the cons horde go nuts x)

260 mp for maxim '. No decent medium tank for soviet's. No decent mainline infantry.

Great.

Same feeling...

Hey relic you said you were supposed to look into penals... But hey lets wait a year.

would have loved to see the SU-100.

But srsly IS-3? Thats just an overkill it would roflstomp everything...

I really like watching RedWings play. He often goes for a different approach. I remember one game he played Wehrmacht and choose the Elefant doctrine with hull down in it (can't remember the name). He won that one and it was just so refreshing not seeing meta.

Since I'm far from good in this game I won't say I have a real clue but I also find Wehrmacht is lacking something. Just small things like the survivability of Grens who often get wiped by tons of things, the survivability of the 251 Halftrack which I feel is a bit low for its price (I really like to use it but it often costs me the game, but idk if it's really a balance thing).

Maybe it's just that this faction needs more knowledge and micro then let's say OKW. I think the WFA factions are just a bit more easy to use to full potential.

lol yeh saw the same cast, a truly epic game!

he bumrushed a brummbar in the same game x)

I guess the sarcasm was lost, I see so many threads by a particular someone I figured I'd make a thread that showcased the awesome side of the Soviet.. just to see what people would come back with.


Also, you may want to look at my 2's rank, just because 4's is what I've played lately doesn't mean I'm not nearly in the top 200 for 2's and rank 56 for 3's.

Well if im not mistaken i met you in 3v3 AT back in january, with your teamm8s: Isbjorn and Haukem if im not mistaken. And you all played horrible and started a huge whinefest in chat when we rekt you as both axis and allies.

Hell I even think Zansibar vidded it and Vali streamed those games, 10/10 blobbing skills.

Soviets arent too strong at all, they just have a shit ton of mediocre units which works well if youre in a AT.