Profile of TAKTCOM

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 275 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Calliope commander every single game20 Jan 2016, 08:00 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Jan 2016, 07:17 AM__deleted__ 1 pass for 125 ammo is good airstrike Nice joke In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Calliope commander every single game20 Jan 2016, 07:08 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Jan 2016, 02:06 AMLuGer33 90% of what OP has said in this thread can be applied to PWerfer or Walking Stuka to a lesser extent. +1 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: As ESL Shows BM 13 Katusha need a little buff18 Jan 2016, 17:47 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2016, 17:22 PM__deleted__ Suxton need a price decrease to 10 fuel to reflect it real cost efficiency. So we need more unused cheap trash like T-34-76 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: As ESL Shows BM 13 Katusha need a little buff18 Jan 2016, 17:04 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jan 2016, 12:37 PMNEVEC It's fine as it is. Other rocket artillery need nerf to katusha level. +1 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: List of units that have fallen out of the meta17 Jan 2016, 16:01 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jan 2016, 11:00 AMAustralian Magic ML-20 is still usefull vs OKW. I tried to use ML-20, and found that for large maps Katyusha effective. Jump back to quoted post17 Jan 2016, 11:00 AMAustralian Magic B-4 pure RNG. Tho I recently killed JT with it I once shot at jagdtiger from B - 4, he did not even try to change the position. To the point where it got the next round, he just had time to full repair his jagdtiger. It was like a B - 4 shot 5 times, hit 2 times. Jump back to quoted post17 Jan 2016, 11:00 AMAustralian Magic KV-1 is not out of meta. With just 8CPs it can save you a day as a call in when you can't afford T4. Add 4% armor bulletins and it's fine. In fact I use them in 2v2 in 60% of my games. Mass of 3-4 KVs can deal with anything. I try use triple bulletins, T-34-85 is still more effective. I do not need a tank to absorb damage, I need a tank to destroy infantry hordes of and Nazi wonder panzers. The most important thing in this doctrine now is "For the Motherland". In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Revitalizing the Soviets and giving more Risk v. Reward16 Jan 2016, 10:28 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Jan 2016, 09:17 AMAustralian Magic Penals: - Come right away. - ...useful at mid and long range. - Can be your mainline infantry. Sorry seem we play different СoH2. In my version penals is nothing without flamethrower. Men who use penals is novices who do not know how does a game. Or veterans tired of endless Shock Rifle & Guard coordination and playing now NKVD, Conskripts Tactics and other trash like Defence Tactics. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Revitalizing the Soviets and giving more Risk v. Reward16 Jan 2016, 06:34 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 21:50 PMAustralian Magic Penals are not great but they are also far away from being useless... Like sov you have alot close combat option: - first, it's CE flamethrower. They not great, but they can clean up the house or cover; - second, cons&molotov. Some sort of you main spam forse so you have few of them anyway; - trid, partyzans. They have nade, molotov and SMG. - fourthly, Shock troops. A bit outdated but still effective. - fifth, PPSH cons. Cons have some real weapon. - At sixth. Assault guards. Something even worse than a PPSH cons, but still have SMG and nade. So why choose penal? No reason. And you do not choose them. Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 21:44 PMPancake Areolas Considering penals get 60% better accuracy with vet, having oorah at vet 2 flamers, 6 men. And being better than a base rifle squad with garand profile. That sounds OP as fuck. Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 22:50 PMPancake Areolas I mean if you think panzerfussiliers are OP, got no clue why you don't see that non doc 6 man flame rifle squad with oorah would be OP just because they don't have frags or smoke or elite infantry durability liek riflemen. Theres really nothing more I can point out. I totally agree. Flame rifle absolutely OP, so why we just not copy-paste absolutely no OP panzerfussiliers, give penal skins (with bolt rifle) and voices? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Operation Barbarossa15 Jan 2016, 11:39 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 11:04 AMrobertmikael Depends what definition you have of "turned Leningrad into ruins"...Germans did a lot of destruction and made the life a lot of harder for the inhabitants. Of course, Leningrad suffered from the war. But it was not turned into a pile of rubble as Stalingrad and Sevastopol. Or burned to ashes as thousands of villages Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 11:04 AMrobertmikael My point was to say that other cities in Western Europe would have surrendered in a similar situation, but Leningrad did not surrender. To surrender to those who will kill you anyway, stupid. I have doubts about the intelligence of Western Europeans (their countries are doing very strange things), but I do not think that they would give up their own executioners. In: The Library
Thread: Operation Barbarossa15 Jan 2016, 10:47 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 10:16 AMrobertmikael I think the Germans turned Leningrad into ruins. After the war, Leningrad are not rebuilt from nothing, like Stalingrad. So no, this did not happen. Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 10:16 AMrobertmikael ...The difference to cities in other nations, was that the Russians didn't understand to surrender the city. Leningrad was not surrender for many reasons. And "Russians didn't understand to surrender the city" was neither one of them. In: The Library
Thread: Operation Barbarossa15 Jan 2016, 09:49 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 09:26 AMArray Well there's troops and there's troops... http://protown.ru/information/hide/5452.html Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 09:26 AMArray Just curious - are you from Russia / ex-Soviet states? It's always interesting to hear different perspectives and sources. Why do I need to specify in my profile Russia if I do not live in it? Of course from Russia. In: The Library