Ost is suffering because they’re basically pigeonholed into getting a puma to counter the t70, otherwise the t70 runs rampant because 3 AT gun shots to kill it is never happening, and the vet 2/3 sight is essentially map hacks. This means Ost usually gets stuck on t3, which is completely dominated by t34/85s, su85s, Mark, and kv1s.
Hasn't it been the case for years now? T-70 has been nerfed several times, it was much stronger before. Now with the incredibly cheap 222 you can build two of them and do the same rampage as a T-70 before it comes to the field. And two 222 counter a T-70.
USF is mainly good because of the Pershing in my opinion. Sov late game is much stronger in general but being able to LUL out a Pershing is so punishing to Ost because zooks/Pershing totally dominate Ost t3.
That’s the way I see things at least.
IMO it is the other way around, You pick a Pershing because Ostheer players prefers to go Mobile defense + T3 spam.
Mobile defense hard counter both T1 and T2 and can compete with USF T3 with the addition of some Ostheer T3 units.
At the end, this is the same logic as for Soviet going KV1 or IS2 commanders to counter Mobile Defense.
I think we really need to get ride of Mobile defense to see what Ostheer is capable of. Today Matchmaking or tourney the result is the same, Mobile Defense everywhere that invalidate any analyse other than Mobile Defense has to be nerf.
And for OKW, 4 volks into Luch is too strong vs USF. The moment you usually start getting some air with a Stuart, the Puma hit the field. If you survive it and start thinking about expending, T3 is already there denying 1/3 of the map or a command panther that will invalidate you first sherman...