Profile of Bananenheld

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198000494642


Thread: Thoughts on Panzergrenadiers18 Mar 2019, 23:49 PM I really like pzgrens, they are either hit or miss though. Alot is micro to make them work, which is good. But sometimes even applying the correct micro (subjective!) They cant pay themselves off. Idk small buff for staying near vehicles or slightly less mp (10, max 20mp) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are soviets popular or too weak so nobody plays them? 17 Mar 2019, 13:19 PM i really like soviets for the overall flexibility. They have properly the most viable openings/build orders/commanders. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF got too many buffs 15 Mar 2019, 21:12 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Mar 2019, 21:08 PMSander93 I think the playerbase of 3v3 and 4v4 combined is roughly 14 times as large as the 1v1 playerbase. I don't think their game experience should be neglected. point is: you can balance 4v4 perfectly if everyone has the same skill level. Thats (almost) never the case, because of 8 people involved, there will be skill gaps(and this skill gap has way more influence of the outcome of the game). that is the problem with 4v4. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bring USF Artillery inline with OKW15 Mar 2019, 15:14 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Mar 2019, 15:05 PMkingdun3284 T4 like Bofors, T2 like forward assembly, ISG like mortar emplacement and mg and atg as well and you need to face multiple things like that in team game that camps at VP. Lol In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bring USF Artillery inline with OKW15 Mar 2019, 06:42 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Mar 2019, 05:36 AMkingdun3284 Rewrite the sentence please:If i can click a button for double AI killing power while having 0 AT power that make my tanks in danger then where do i sign up? But having non-doctrinal mobile rocket artillery is simply no downside. You get access to more strategic option. Therefore your comparison is not inappropriate and derail the topic. just keep it on AP round if you suck so hard In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The ethical considerations of playing COH213 Mar 2019, 13:57 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2019, 13:51 PMSHALLAHJUSTICE That is true. All sides were guilty of some kind of war crime. just shows you that every nation does not act morally. i mean the fact alone you decided to mention nazis and not soviets (so many more died due communism). if we go for your high morally standards you cant play any history game at all(well you can play, but you are not allowed to have fun :^)) In: Lobby
Thread: The ethical considerations of playing COH213 Mar 2019, 13:39 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2019, 13:32 PMVipper I personally find wrong to play as USF that is the only nation that has dropped not 1 but 2 Atomic on civilian targets. i cant play UKF for that reason. So many have suffered or died under the british empire. In: Lobby
Thread: USF got too many buffs 11 Mar 2019, 14:25 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2019, 14:07 PMkingdun3284 What if my teammate is USF also? So we both have nothing to do in first 5 minute Thats alot of infantry to screen for your so vulnerable mortar. Or REs with smoke. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF got too many buffs 11 Mar 2019, 14:04 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2019, 13:49 PMkingdun3284 Even pure rifleman spam will get out numbered by OKWs volks spam. So early mortar without mg support is simply a dead mortar. If only axis had not access to an early mortar with better range or OKW without early infantry advantage. Oh wait they do ... Sooo..you are complaining that axis ( 2 different factions) work together (since okw has neither early mg or mortar) and beat you alone with only US? U got teamwork'd mate In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF got too many buffs 11 Mar 2019, 13:46 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2019, 13:44 PMVipper If only they had access to an early mortar, smoke grenades or where good at flanking... Oh wait they do... Map too small on 4v4 shitfest XD In: COH2 Balance