Profile of comm_ash

STGs are for mid-close range, whilst G43s are for long range, as well as better on the move DPS.

It's really up to you, but I would reccomend STGs because you get more for the cost. cloak + stun nade + tactical assault melts squads.

Alright guys I have been thinking about how annoying zook and schreks can be to (light) vehicles, since it is fairly hard to kite the 5-range that you have to fire before zooks and schrecks can hit you.

I have developed a simple solution to hurt blobbers, but keep the usefulness of bazookas and panzerschrecks at closer ranges, so that they can still be used to supplement AT guns and armor, without promoting a-move blobs.

Bazookas and Panzerschrecks -> 0 accuracy at long range

Let me explain what this means. This means that bazookas and panzerschrecks can no longer lock onto your armor at max range, guaranteeing a hit. You can now dodge rockets that have been fired by moving away from their projected path. Bazookas and Panzerschrecks will now be ambush and support weapons, instead of self-sufficient AT weapons like AT guns.

What it doesn't mean, is that zookas and panzerschrecks will be useless. They can still hit vehicles at long range through scatter, and they can still have accuracy at close-mid range, so that enemy armor that is "going deep" can be punished with tracking rounds.

This change will also probably have to come with a tweak of bazooka and panzerschreck scatter and the ability to force "hold fire."

i dont need to play them they are easy as fuck no micromanagement included. no challenge. a petty excuse for a cheap quick win i say.

Quick question, why do you even bother posting this shit on the forum, when you know it just means that even less people will listen to your "points."

Its not a badge of honor to know your ignorant and not give a shit.

It's almost like the only reason you post is to see the "1 New Notification" alert at the top of your screen.

alright, let's nerf stuarts AI then if it's meant as AT, right?

Ok, then buff it's at. It has 40 less damage and 10 less range than similarly priced puma.

Stuart is an all round unit that doesn't excel in any particular role. If you think it's shock value is anywhere near that of the luchs', you may be high. The correct unit to compare the luchs to, is the t70.

No player get's a stuart out to counter a 222. The stuart was and is seen pretty much as a shock unit against infantry in every game. It's indeed hybrid but to say it's role like the AEC, puma or m10 is far fetched, since it has excellent AI abilities unlike those units mentioned.

It still has nowhere near the anti infantry shock value of a T70 or luchs, which can wipe a squad much more quickly and hunt them fown on retreat more effectively.

While people don't buy a stuart to counter a 222, they absolutely do buy it to counter a fht, puma, luchs, ht, or stuka. It is meant to go a lot deeper to fulfill it's roles than a T70 or a luchs, as it's abilities show.

The luchs doesn't need the extra hp to fulfill it's roles, and can make do with micro like the t70 does. It needed it before because of how late it hit, but now it hits with every other light vehicle.

Also, as a side note, the okw has much better supporting at for the luchs than a T70 has, so it's not like the hp is needed to help it survive diving tanks. If the luchs needs 400hp, so does the t70.