Profile of Brachiaraidos

Jump back to quoted post2 Oct 2014, 21:45 PMRomeo

Well it's true, against a jagdpanzer it works very well. Yes bazookas are bad, yes the M3 is bad, but in that specific situation he's got a point.

Jump back to quoted post30 Sep 2014, 16:59 PMAchtAchter

Imagine how strong at nades and panzerfausts become.

Recently a lot of threads suggest that tanks should be removed from the game with all the penalties people want to have on them; fuel upkeep, damage over time on engine crits and no auto fire for heavy tanks.

Jump back to quoted post30 Sep 2014, 15:44 PMCardboard Tank

Why not 60 range? Oh, yeah, German units aren´t supposed to fire back. You just want more cheese for that faction.

You are claiming ISU-152s are under-performing...

You aren´t willing to see the possible synergy in team games from ISU-152s and Su-100s with that range...

I made my point clear and I´m out of here. Soviet only players and their cheese.

Jump back to quoted post30 Sep 2014, 12:07 PMIamLegion

By this notion we could take the two units being discussed; the T34/85 and the King Tiger and say that both have an index of 1; ie they are fair. A problem arises, however, when you keep improving a units stats (ability). While the units ability may be improving and the associated resource cost with it (to maintain an index of 1) there comes a point where the unit is unkillable. If the unit does too much damage such that no other unit can even approach it and/or it has too much armour such that no shot can damage it then the index becomes irrelevant. No amount of resources can justify the power of the unit.

As such a unit like the King Tiger may be very close to the above unkillable category. Very few units have the fire power to penetrate its armour. It also has great fire power. Its approaching that point where the fact that it costs 340 fuel is less relevant.

And while King Tigers are not so obtainable in 1v1 it is a serious option in 2v2 3v3 4v4.

Come to think of it, while writing this; the relation between ability and cost (the index) should not be a direct linear relationship.