Profile of Cannonade

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 752

General Information


Thread: Action Items: Balance Feedback Required!24 Jul 2014, 17:36 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Jul 2014, 14:51 PMBob Loblaw Maxims already have the worst retreat animation so going down two troops would seal their fate even if you hit retreat the second you see a bad situation developing. How is the animation different from Ost MG42? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Action Items: Balance Feedback Required!24 Jul 2014, 17:33 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Jul 2014, 15:34 PMNapalm The 120 and DHSK will get caught in a retreat loop. A new crew member will take the weapon and get killed. This continues in a loop while the unit is not falling back. Thanks. I thought the 120mm weapon man was last to die though. Nonetheless, my question still stands to the original poster I put it to for confirmation of what he meant in the context of therest of his post. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Katyusha seriously need a nerf24 Jul 2014, 17:14 PM I checked the stats on the linked site, and was surprised to see Katyusha not only has longer range (40) but also a smaller scatter distance, than Panzerwerfer. Very strange. Range needs attention, as does AoE, as dmg is same as Panzerwerfer. Seems to have been really quite seriously overbuffed, out of proportion to equivalents. I missed a few patches so I must not have noticed this or I would have spoken up earlier. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Katyusha seriously need a nerf24 Jul 2014, 16:29 PM Wtf is Frikadelle still doing here. Whos privates has he kissed? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Action Items: Balance Feedback Required!24 Jul 2014, 13:08 PM Kreatiir: Think you missed my question here: http://www.coh2.org/topic/20942/action-items-balance-feedback-required/post/187369 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Action Items: Balance Feedback Required!24 Jul 2014, 12:09 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Jul 2014, 12:00 PMpigsoup this will make at gun and maxim crew members to drop their weapons even more so than right now. so i do not think that is a good idea. A 4man unit would drop the weapon at exactly the same rate as till now. A 6man unit with 4man equivalency in hps would indeed drop it more often, but that can secondarily be fixed by changing the time needed for another model to man the weapon (and this pretty much only applies to Maxim/Dushka). Overall, though I think it is a minor concern, as it happens quite fast already as is now. (With one notable exception, which is persistant ground flame effects. An MG weapon that loses its gunner in a Molotov or MHT Flame round, suffers horrificaly as man after man tries to reman the gun and catches fire.) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Katyusha seriously need a nerf24 Jul 2014, 12:03 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Jul 2014, 11:36 AMChegwin Maybe try using it and dont look what people say here ? I've used it yesterday to see just had bad it is. First hit 8 kills second 10 kills. When i lost it it had 60 something kills. Such a waste of resources! Replay please. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Katyusha seriously need a nerf24 Jul 2014, 12:02 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Jul 2014, 11:19 AMOZtheWiZARD It was designed this way so when you move your Rifles in a nice juicy cluster of units you get extra "rewards" when under Stuka barrage. On the serious note I like VonIvan's idea of increasing Katyusha cooldown to match its new performance. Tbh, its abit the opposite actually. Katyusha template is good for clusters, whereas Stuka has a better effect on a parallel aligned frontline (and, also for retreat wipes, because you can preidct the linear retreat path and time it to hit along it). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Action Items: Balance Feedback Required!24 Jul 2014, 11:54 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Jul 2014, 11:06 AMBabaRoga It was horrible idea in COH OF and it will be terrible idea here. What you are saying doesn't sound wrong in this example, but across the game in other instances it would wreck havoc. For example, Having Unit and healing bunker would make that unit very powerful for example as opposed to unit that has to run back to HQ to heal, it would allow someone to exploit extra survivability to max with medic bunker, keeping constant pressure without losing any models. It would create further imbalances throughout the game. I repeat again, it was terrible in OF COH Can you please explain how a generalised LMG dmg, rather than it chewing one model to death at a time, is related to your post? I dont get it. Please give a scenario in which what you talk above would happen against an LMG? Furthermore, MG42 has a version of this proposed change by Cruzz already in effect. Its DPS and suppression factor (iirc) is directly related to and scaled by how many models it is firing at. So a precedent, of sorts, already exists. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Action Items: Balance Feedback Required!24 Jul 2014, 11:52 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Jul 2014, 10:29 AMKreatiir Skinless & Cannonade, please keep it tidy and don't get personal. You both have other opinions, respect it. I havent gotten personal and have been respectful to an extreme in an attempt of keeping the discussion ontopic. Dont paint me with that same brush. Its not warranted. In: COH2 Balance