It's a good thing then I didn't in fact proclaim to have a 100% accurate uber-mathematical model of the CoH2 game that takes literally everything into consideration. It's a forum post, not a scientific paper.
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
What mathematical process except simple algebra did I utilize, and where did the math go wrong? Also, "considerably regarded"? Seriously? Normally I don't care about such things but if you want to go all high and mighty and Latin in your posts you should at least understand that big words and misplaced adverbs do not help your argument.
Oh it's a forum post now ? With all your numbers blazing and "calculative" approach you certainly did your best (I suspect) to make it appear as "scientific" as possible, since your logic was obviously to camouflage your subjective and biased way of thinking about the (dis)balance of a game with this quasi mathematical charade.
1. obvious and irrelevant
2. medium tanks have their role and place within the timing and the game itself. I've seen far more games literally decided by the successful deployment of Pz4's, E8's and T34 groups than I've seen these so called magical turnarounds when all of the fuel is injected into one heavy unit with the "all or nothing" strategy in mind. Just for the record, I'm not talking about the super late game beyond the 1h mark - where fuel is abundant, all rules fade and mostly chaos reigns.
3. one shock squad or a rifle miniblob will send that At gun and shreck blobs back to base in no time..
and so on, and so on..
4. "hotly contested VP" guarded by the sole heavy tank !??
Yeah maybe if the allied player have lost 90% of his units and is contemplating surrender ... ever used Jacksons, SU-85's, or Thunderbolts to force the Tiger to "unpark" itself ? Or nevermind the range based counters, ever tried flanking with those 3 hypothetical mediums, and by flanking I don't mean rushing headlessly into the FOW, but rather tactical (should there be any other?) flanking maneuver which includes scouting actions and preemptive arty strikes on the AT's and such..
5. and 6. part obvious, part irrelevant, part untrue. I'm not sure if you've ever even had the pleasure to try to 'outmicro' three or even two of those "marginally" faster allied mediums with the Tiger, or god forbid something even slower.. ? If you went head on without support, and found yourself rushed on with more than two mediums you just might try to blitz reverse and hope to forget about the whole thing. In half of these scenarios you might lose the engine, get stuck with the medium behind your back and two others melting your health bar from the flanks.. Even if you manage to kill one or two of the mediums before the third or the arty finish u off, allied player will consider that a small victory and a huge morale boost, especially if the opponent is fuel starved.
Ceterum censeo
your simpleton math went wrong the moment you tried to thoughtlessly augment your argument with it. And as of my misplaced try at satire and your obvious displaced ability to comprehend that I was making fun of your overzealously quantiplaced usage of the word "
considerably" I am left considerably perplexed
one other thing, can you share some light on how you came up with your forum nickname if it's no secret ?