Is the panther fine?
1 Sep 2019, 16:07 PM
#21
Posts: 479
Yeah, I think the Panther is fine in it's current state but Allied Tank Destroyers are probably slightly over-performing relative to their cost (SU-85 and Jackson). If they aren't going to significantly increase the cost of these I would say they should look to reduce the Panther back down to 175 and I think the Comet could also see the same price reduction since I think Churchill's are still slightly over-performing at the moment due to being spammable and cost efficient against Panthers usually allowing you to outnumber them. I was fine with the cost reduction for the Firefly but I don't feel like tulip cost needed to be reduced significantly.
1 Sep 2019, 17:42 PM
#22
Posts: 1979
Yeah, I think the Panther is fine in it's current state but Allied Tank Destroyers are probably slightly over-performing relative to their cost (SU-85 and Jackson). If they aren't going to significantly increase the cost of these I would say they should look to reduce the Panther back down to 175 and I think the Comet could also see the same price reduction since I think Churchill's are still slightly over-performing at the moment due to being spammable and cost efficient against Panthers usually allowing you to outnumber them. I was fine with the cost reduction for the Firefly but I don't feel like tulip cost needed to be reduced significantly.
The jackson prolly needs to be 155 fuel... but the su-85 is costs just right at 130 considering how its quite slow and helpless when getting flanked
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
96 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.815139.854+3
- 2.46769.871+2
- 3.882302.745+1
- 4.408214.656+3
- 5.21156.790-2
- 6.303130.700-1
- 7.12857.692+8
- 8.366193.655+3
- 9.739448.623+3
- 10.505328.606+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
16
Download
2740