Login

russian armor

Commander KV1 and Easy8 rework idea's

24 Mar 2019, 22:24 PM
#41
avatar of flyingpancake

Posts: 186 | Subs: 1

Saying KV1 is not good enough is like saying JLI are underpowered. End thread. the original poster can go to the tutorials.

I never said the KV1 was bad, i said the kv1 does not have a distinct enough role compaired to the kv1.
25 Mar 2019, 02:52 AM
#42
avatar of What Doth Life?!
Patrion 27

Posts: 1664

Please fix Fire Up! and bundle it with Easy 8 and switch Dozer Blade for Easy 8 in the new commander :)
ddd
25 Mar 2019, 14:02 PM
#43
avatar of ddd

Posts: 528 | Subs: 1

Please fix Fire Up! and bundle it with Easy 8 and switch Dozer Blade for Easy 8 in the new commander :)


Why would you bundle sprint with tank? Fire up! should be like assault package from okw feuersturm which has flamethrower, mp40 and frags. Fire up! would have flamethrower, sprint and flares. Bundling easy8 with sprint makes no sense.
25 Mar 2019, 14:57 PM
#44
avatar of WingZero

Posts: 1484

KV-1 is not worth the cost to be honest, its main gun is terrible. The only purpose of building this tank is to soak up damage (I would rather build KV-8 for this role). I think the coaxel machine gun needs a bit buff to damage infantry if the tank is useless against tanks.
25 Mar 2019, 17:04 PM
#45
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13476 | Subs: 1

KV-1 is not worth the cost to be honest, its main gun is terrible. The only purpose of building this tank is to soak up damage (I would rather build KV-8 for this role). I think the coaxel machine gun needs a bit buff to damage infantry if the tank is useless against tanks.

The KV-1 will has a very good chance to beat a PvIV so its in not useless against tanks.
26 Mar 2019, 23:50 PM
#46
avatar of Clarity

Posts: 479

jump backJump back to quoted post22 Mar 2019, 08:25 AMVipper

The KV-1 is not fighting T-34/85 but PzIV. And it can beat easily. It does not need to buffed.

If T-34/85 feel better it is because it got its mg ninja buffed the same time T-34/76 by accident.

And the 2 unit are currently different, one is more durable the other has a better gun.

The only thing KV-1 needs is different vet 1 abilities and different vet bonuses.


To be honest I don't really even want the KV-1 to have a price change, I would rather have the 85 be 140 fuel so cost-wise they are about the same. If the price was changed on the KV-1 I would only want it to be changed marginally, maybe 20 manpower and 5 fuel at the most.
27 Mar 2019, 01:13 AM
#47
avatar of WAAAGH2000

Posts: 730

KV1 be commander tank is good idea....
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

Germany 24
Germany 536

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

543 users are online: 1 member and 542 guests
Katitof
18 posts in the last 24h
46 posts in the last week
100 posts in the last month
Registered members: 44652
Welcome our newest member, Soumyfwr7
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM