Posts: 1384
Meta changes as a direct response to patches. Granted, there may be organic shifts in the meta but most come from buffs & nerfs.
Posts: 770
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
It took how many years for people to figure out that veterancy wasn't working on reinforced models
Posts: 930
Penetration is a bit lowish for an AT unit could use a penetration buff
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Coh2 lacks an evolving metagame because it lacks creative and innovative players.
Posts: 770
You are joking, right?
Puma is pretty much a miniature version of the panther, and if you vet it you can easily deal with shermans and t34s
Posts: 17892 | Subs: 8
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 455
Dedicated tank destroyer at 8 cp is stronger then stock armored car dedicated to counter light armor and some med tanks and arriving at 6cp.LOL, you just made my day.
More news at 11.
Posts: 174
Dedicated tank destroyer at 8 cp is stronger then stock armored car dedicated to counter light armor and some med tanks arriving at 6cp.
More news at 11.
Posts: 770
Perfect response to the post above you complaining that the M10 has more penetration than the Puma.
Posts: 174
Well if the puma was somewhat cheaper i would agree with you. the thing is its nearly as expensive as a m10. now i do not mind one unit being better then the other unit but this is rather a large difference in efficiency. So once again you and katitof fail but that's fairly common.
Posts: 484
Posts: 4474
Katitof-2018
Posts: 17892 | Subs: 8
Look i would agree with what kat said if it wasn't that the puma suffer from the same problem as all axis tank
Low accuracy ,big target size
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Look i would agree with what kat said if it wasn't that the puma suffer from the same problem as all axis tank
Low accuracy ,big target size
Posts: 770
Yeah but they don't share the same role.
The M10 is a cheap and efficient tank destroyer and the Puma is intended more as a hard counter to Allied light vehicles that can also help kill medium armor like the AEC.
Their costs may not reflect their performance perfectly relative to one another but so what? Those little imbalances exist all over the game.
You're gonna tell me the 4-man .50 cal HMG should be 280 MP while the MG42 is only 260? Or that the 222 should be 280 / 15 while the M20 Utility Car is a whopping 340 / 20?
It's not like OST doesn't have their own cheap tank destroyer already - the Stug, that with target weak point can practically 1v1 a Pershing.
I guess I just don't get why the M10 being "better" than the Puma is an issue given their defined roles.
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
[...]
why take a stug when you can have a panther ?
[...]
Posts: 17892 | Subs: 8
lel
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
You need to forgive him.
He never lasted long enough in multiplayer game to meet churchill.
Posts: 17892 | Subs: 8
Actually, I've noticed that I've kinda pulled that phrase out of context.
His point was valid (about unit diversity), but still doesn't explains why Puma should be more cost efficient.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
 |
|
|
43 | ||
 |
|
|
15 | ||
 |
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
 |
|
|
39 | ||
 |
|
|
24 | ||
|
|
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
13 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
