Login

russian armor

coh2 dps chart

23 Mar 2016, 22:15 PM
#1
avatar of Firesparks

Posts: 1930

I've updated my dps chart with the latest patch. this include all the small arms used by infantry and vehicles, as well as the effect of the cover on tommies and ostruppen. I've also improved the chart to show dps in incremental of five meters up to 45 meters.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LOYMDi_XR7rILsk6HbAZqGihsk22t-45C_6NbQEP-m0/edit#gid=1675306803

update: added kubel mg34

updated 2: added a tech cost chart

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1g5csCZt9UrVnNy-k9w8DRh1F6Rzeu7hMCLXZoxSdNRk/edit#gid=0
23 Mar 2016, 22:21 PM
#2
avatar of newvan

Posts: 354

Thanks for work.
23 Mar 2016, 22:28 PM
#3
avatar of Obersoldat

Posts: 393

Wow man this is amazing, great work keep it up! :thumbsup:
23 Mar 2016, 23:01 PM
#4
avatar of Tobis
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4

Does anyone know who was working on this vehicle veterancy spreadsheet?

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kzY9-UwZSQ19_EL3LTZoBHjMCwD1ZaDrEtedjKap4wM/edit#gid=110608506
23 Mar 2016, 23:04 PM
#5
avatar of Firesparks

Posts: 1930

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Mar 2016, 23:01 PMTobis
Does anyone know who was working on this vehicle veterancy spreadsheet?

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kzY9-UwZSQ19_EL3LTZoBHjMCwD1ZaDrEtedjKap4wM/edit#gid=110608506


coh2.org already have a guide listing all the veterancy. It is current as far I can tell.

https://www.coh2.org/guides/29892/the-company-of-heroes-2-veterancy-guide
23 Mar 2016, 23:25 PM
#6
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

I thank you greatly for your work!
23 Mar 2016, 23:50 PM
#7
avatar of Tobis
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4



coh2.org already have a guide listing all the veterancy. It is current as far I can tell.

https://www.coh2.org/guides/29892/the-company-of-heroes-2-veterancy-guide


Yea I know, but it was handy to see how the veterancy effected the stats, and how different vet bonuses worked together.
24 Mar 2016, 02:34 AM
#8
avatar of Nezmith

Posts: 16

Are the OKW Obersoldaten MG34 values listed backwards? It doesn't make a lot of sense to have a machine gun do more damage as a unit moves further away.
24 Mar 2016, 02:37 AM
#9
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Mar 2016, 02:34 AMNezmith
Are the OKW Obersoldaten MG34 values listed backwards? It doesn't make a lot of sense to have a machine gun do more damage as a unit moves further away.

Not just them, all LMG weapons follow this pattern. While it is a bit illogical, yes, it's the appropriate drawback for a weapon so good at long-range.
24 Mar 2016, 13:56 PM
#10
avatar of Galgengeiler

Posts: 21

Thank you very much for this, Firesparks.
24 Mar 2016, 14:03 PM
#11
avatar of SturmTigerTrafalgar

Posts: 160

which one is the standard weapon of the Bren carrier and which one the upgrade?
24 Mar 2016, 18:52 PM
#12
avatar of Spinflight

Posts: 680

Bren lmg is the standard. Vickers K is the upgrade.

No idea why the upgrade does half the dps, and less than an equivalently priced Bren...
24 Mar 2016, 19:40 PM
#13
avatar of CookiezNcreem
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15

Bren lmg is the standard. Vickers K is the upgrade.

No idea why the upgrade does half the dps, and less than an equivalently priced Bren...



Those lmgs are identical in all but name, and always have been. Are you looking at the UC vickers K mg upgrade?


edit: i think i know what youre talking about now, vickers K adds dps as well as a suppression upgrade, so i think everythings good there. Especially if you compare it with the kubel or WC51.

(By the way, firesparks, I dont see Kubel under OKW vehicles or small arms in this spreadsheet?)
24 Mar 2016, 21:15 PM
#14
avatar of Firesparks

Posts: 1930



(By the way, firesparks, I dont see Kubel under OKW vehicles or small arms in this spreadsheet?)

fixed, thank you. it's under the vehicle section.
24 Mar 2016, 21:19 PM
#15
avatar of Spinflight

Posts: 680

So comparing the efficiency of mainline infantry and builders at Vet 0 and 25m...

I've used 20 minutes for T1 and 15 minutes for T2. Assumed 5 reinforcements of 2 models each. 4 minutes total combat. These are purely arbitrary.

OKW:
Sturms: 592 damage * 4 / 780 | 480 = 3.03| 4.93
Volks. 582 damage * 5 / 640MP = 4.54


Ost:
Pio. 172 damage * 4 / 570MP | 370MP = 1.2 | 1.84
Gren: 720 damage * 4/ 645MP = 4.44

USF:
RE. 350 damage * 4/ 550MP | 350MP = 2.52| 4.0
Rifles. 562 damage * 5/ 700MP = 4.0

Sov:
Eng: 307 damage * 4 / 482MP | 312 = 2.56| 3.92
Cons. 420 damage * 6 / 560 = 4.5

UKF:
RE. 115 damage * 4/ 562MP = 1.2
IS. 796 damage * 4/ 700 | 420 = 4.52 | 7.56
Cover 835 damage * 4/ 700 | 420 = 4.76 | 7.92





Close combat ( range 5m)


OKW:
Sturms: 3487 damage * 4 / 780 | 480 = 17.88| 29.04
Volks. 960 damage * 5 / 640MP = 7.5


Ost:
Pio. 1476 damage * 4 / 570MP | 370MP = 10.32 | 16
Gren: 1216 damage * 4 / 645MP = 7.52

USF:
RE. 1106 damage * 4 / 550MP | 350MP = 8.04 | 12.64
Rifles. 1404 damage * 5 / 700MP = 10

Sov:
Eng: 746 damage * 4 / 482MP | 312 = 6.16 | 9.6
Cons. 698 damage * 6 / 560 = 7.5

UKF:
RE. 1480 damage * 4 / 562MP = 10.52
IS. 1041 damage * 4 / 700 | 420 = 5.92 | 9.88
Cover 1101 damage * 4 / 700 | 420 = 6.28 | 10.48


26 Mar 2016, 10:04 AM
#16
avatar of Bohewulf

Posts: 82

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Mar 2016, 02:34 AMNezmith
Are the OKW Obersoldaten MG34 values listed backwards? It doesn't make a lot of sense to have a machine gun do more damage as a unit moves further away.


Well, I agree that the damage difference doesnt make sense at all. If u are hit by a bullet it doesnt make a difference if u are hit from two or from 200 meters.


However, in the universe of COH the damage tables actually seem to include accurcy somewhat. And in this context the lmg table makes indeed sense: A heavy weapon like a lmg is not that flexible in close or near distance combat which is reflected by the stats.

26 Mar 2016, 11:32 AM
#17
avatar of vasa1719

Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4

Permanently Banned
Thanks for work.
28 Mar 2016, 00:31 AM
#18
avatar of Bohewulf

Posts: 82

@op

It seems the values for OKW light jaeger g43 arent correct. Can you confirm?

Anyway, thanks for this great summary.
28 Mar 2016, 00:58 AM
#19
avatar of Firesparks

Posts: 1930

@op

It seems the values for OKW light jaeger g43 arent correct. Can you confirm?

Anyway, thanks for this great summary.


can you be a bit more specific? are you referring to jaeger_light_recon_g43 ? If you're referring to their reverse dps profile, I assume that's to compensate for their kill crit.

the scoped garand on the pathfinder have the same characteristic.
28 Mar 2016, 01:02 AM
#20
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

I thought it looked surprisingly bad myself, but then I figured it doesn't need to have much DPS when it insta-kills at 75% anyway.
0 user is browsing this thread:

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

681 users are online: 1 member and 680 guests
aerafield
3 posts in the last 24h
4 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48722
Welcome our newest member, asherllc
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM