This idea is as bad as having planes crashing planes randomly crashing into the battlefield. Each fight tells a different story.
having planes crashing planes randomly chrashing? are you sure you arent jaden smith?
Mortars should cause abandon on tanks with exposed crew
12 Jan 2016, 19:28 PM
#21
Posts: 12
having planes crashing planes randomly chrashing? are you sure you arent jaden smith?
12 Jan 2016, 19:50 PM
#22
Posts: 738
I agree, but only because UKF have no access to open top tanks and all other factions need a healthy nerd.
12 Jan 2016, 19:59 PM
#23
Posts: 558 | Subs: 1
horrible idea
12 Jan 2016, 20:23 PM
#24
Posts: 935
I think 1 roket of BM13 should move turret away from KT and put it somewhere near. It would be so great!
12 Jan 2016, 20:24 PM
#25
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
Technically mortars already can if they penetrate a low health tank and finish it off to trigger the critical
Those stacked Mortar Armor Penetration+ Bulletins guys, amirite?
Those stacked Mortar Armor Penetration+ Bulletins guys, amirite?
12 Jan 2016, 20:32 PM
#26
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Allied mortars would literally hard counter super heavy tanks then, those things can't dodge for shit. But be my guest, USF is the one true faction for me. #believe
Heavies don't have open tops though.
12 Jan 2016, 20:33 PM
#27
Posts: 21
Strongly disagree with your idea.
Lets start to count the open top vehicles in the game:
Allies:
M3
M5 HT
M5 HT USF version
M5 USF version with mortar
M8 Greyhound
M10
Priest
Saxon
Wasp
M20
M36
Scott
Su-76
Total:13
Axis:
Sdfkz 250 HT
Sdfkz 250 HT with mortar
Sdkfz 251 Flak
Ostwind
Kubelwagon
Total:5.
Problem ?
Clearly the idea favor one side.
However, here's a suggestion than - > Any vehicle suffering turret lock OR engine damage AND is axis - > will be evacuated immediately.
Why? Because it will add a new elemnt of depth into the game. (Also happened IRL, when the a tiger was turret locked > and was evacuated shortly after.)
See the logic ?
No ?
Lets start to count the open top vehicles in the game:
Allies:
M3
M5 HT
M5 HT USF version
M5 USF version with mortar
M8 Greyhound
M10
Priest
Saxon
Wasp
M20
M36
Scott
Su-76
Total:13
Axis:
Sdfkz 250 HT
Sdfkz 250 HT with mortar
Sdkfz 251 Flak
Ostwind
Kubelwagon
Total:5.
Problem ?
Clearly the idea favor one side.
However, here's a suggestion than - > Any vehicle suffering turret lock OR engine damage AND is axis - > will be evacuated immediately.
Why? Because it will add a new elemnt of depth into the game. (Also happened IRL, when the a tiger was turret locked > and was evacuated shortly after.)
See the logic ?
No ?
12 Jan 2016, 20:38 PM
#28
Posts: 393
I support this idea, will add great immersion to the game. Maybe also let the 120mm mortar crewshock tanks that dont have an open top like tiger/kt/panther/p4 etc..
The only reason COH2 is still around, is because it's preserved by salt.
12 Jan 2016, 20:49 PM
#29
Posts: 2260 | Subs: 1
i suggest OP makes a mod with this feature and distributes it to his followers.
so everybody is happy
so everybody is happy
12 Jan 2016, 21:12 PM
#30
Posts: 1094
I think this would add a new and interesting dynamic to gameplay, and give mortars and other artillery more late game utility.
But wouldn't this just be a massive USF nerf?
Consider the amount of open topped units each faction has, USF clearly has the most.
Jackson
Priest
M10
m20 (?)
WC50
scott
still a cool idea but I think it would be very hard to balance.
12 Jan 2016, 21:12 PM
#31
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Can't we just make mortars hitting tanks with 100% penetration to make them useful?
I don't support this idea.
I don't support this idea.
12 Jan 2016, 21:23 PM
#32
Posts: 278
Yes, but all tanks should be abandoned when hit by mortars, not just the open tops. After all, a mortar round would be pretty hard to distinguish from a p47 rocket from inside, so the crew would probably run away just in case. Also, so long as we're at it we should implement random air supremacy/artillery shells throughout the game. To better capture the feeling of WWII. Oh and every penetrating shot should be a kill.
12 Jan 2016, 21:24 PM
#33
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
M5 HT USF version
M8 Greyhound
Saxon
Sdfkz 250 HT
The wot?
12 Jan 2016, 21:28 PM
#34
Posts: 348
Let's have a 30 munition ability hardcountering a 350 mp 125 Fuel tank.... ( In the case of grenades)
Let's have a 240 mp unit hard counter a 350mp 125 fuel tank...
Flame throwers I agree with but the ability for RNG mortars and Frag Grenades to instantly decrew a tank is stupid.
Let's have a 240 mp unit hard counter a 350mp 125 fuel tank...
Flame throwers I agree with but the ability for RNG mortars and Frag Grenades to instantly decrew a tank is stupid.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKlnjwzT1IruAZFb0EA-5pQMy channel where I watch games and get upset at them.
12 Jan 2016, 22:35 PM
#35
Posts: 403
FREE
ABANDONED
TANKS
ABANDONED
TANKS
My place in the ladder is irrelevant as long as I am matched with opponents of the same rank and play all factions (balance at place 1000+ is no different from balance in top 100 if we consider what I said before the brakets) so I don't care about your assertion which is also irrelevant.
12 Jan 2016, 22:54 PM
#36
Posts: 322 | Subs: 1
can some one make a mod i in which we can try this new mechanic?
12 Jan 2016, 23:07 PM
#37
Posts: 1248
I'm not seeing why we want to nerf Ostwinds.
hahahhahaa
12 Jan 2016, 23:08 PM
#38
Posts: 1248
I don't see it as adding whole new strategic level to the game, I see it as adding whole new RNG to the game that affects mostly allies, is unneeded and allows 240 mp units to counter 300+mp 100+fu units.
Unless your goal is to take a steamy dump on the balance, then its a bad idea.
Agreed. Ostwinds would become useless.
12 Jan 2016, 23:09 PM
#39
Posts: 1248
This idea is as bad as having planes crashing planes randomly crashing into the battlefield. Each fight tells a different story.
12 Jan 2016, 23:12 PM
#40
Posts: 1144 | Subs: 7
i thought we wanted to get rid of abandon.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
82 | ||
 |
|
|
76 | ||
|
|
|
|
39 | ||
 |
|
|
26 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
579 | ||
|
|
|
|
20 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.968562.633+23
- 2.555227.710+11
- 3.29446.865-1
- 4.276110.715+14
- 5.7814.848+7
- 6.259143.644+3
- 7.250150.625+11
- 8.22491.711+11
- 9.250135.649+1
- 10.19265.747+5
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
7
Download
759
Board Info
3 posts in the last 24h
39 posts in the last week
131 posts in the last month
39 posts in the last week
131 posts in the last month
Registered members: 45086
Welcome our newest member, buycashapppoint652
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, buycashapppoint652
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM