Disembark for Pak-43 and howitzers
21 Nov 2015, 09:38 AM
#1
Posts: 747 | Subs: 2
What if crews could "disembark" from heavy stationary howitzers and Pak43 guns? They should be able to rebuilt their weapon for a discount and keep the vet. Ofc, some adjustments have to be made in order to prevent exploitation/op-ness, but I think it is a good idea to be able to "move" your stationary weapons.
 | Playercard of RedT3rror | |||||||||||||||
|
21 Nov 2015, 16:53 PM
#2
Posts: 38
A better option is to use the half-tracks to move the stationary guns around.
This will make the half-tracks even more useful and stationary guns an investment not countered by a 120 muni strike.
This will make the half-tracks even more useful and stationary guns an investment not countered by a 120 muni strike.
21 Nov 2015, 17:28 PM
#3
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
A better option is to use the half-tracks to move the stationary guns around.
This will make the half-tracks even more useful and stationary guns an investment not countered by a 120 muni strike.
Cool idea!
21 Nov 2015, 23:55 PM
#4
3 
Posts: 587
Imagine a Kubelwagen towing a PAK 43 around the map 
But yeah it could add new elements to the game, but attaching the gun to a vehicle should not be too fast, since then you could move away from stuka dive bombs / IL-2 bombing runs
But yeah it could add new elements to the game, but attaching the gun to a vehicle should not be too fast, since then you could move away from stuka dive bombs / IL-2 bombing runs
22 Nov 2015, 01:07 AM
#5
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
Imagine a Kubelwagen towing a PAK 43 around the map
But yeah it could add new elements to the game, but attaching the gun to a vehicle should not be too fast, since then you could move away from stuka dive bombs / IL-2 bombing runs
could be solved with a "towing up" time, like 5-6 seconds to attach the pak to the halftrack
23 Nov 2015, 13:21 PM
#6
1 Posts: 90
A better option is to use the half-tracks to move the stationary guns around.
This will make the half-tracks even more useful and stationary guns an investment not countered by a 120 muni strike.
+1
23 Nov 2015, 13:36 PM
#7
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Howies are fine.
It's Pak43, 17 Pounder, Bofors and Mortar Emplacement which need ability to "lose" for 50% (or any other %) of resources.
It's Pak43, 17 Pounder, Bofors and Mortar Emplacement which need ability to "lose" for 50% (or any other %) of resources.
23 Nov 2015, 14:02 PM
#8
Posts: 1003
I imagine it as a OKW truck, whitch can you place and if need disembark. During truck "form" it can be vulnerable to small arms fire.
I want to have the same chance, to win for each side.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
88 | ||
 |
|
|
49 | ||
|
|
|
|
47 | ||
|
|
|
|
40 | ||
|
|
|
|
15 | ||
 |
|
|
11 | ||
 |
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.968562.633+23
- 2.555227.710+11
- 3.29144.869+1
- 4.275110.714+13
- 5.259143.644+3
- 6.249150.624+10
- 7.19265.747+5
- 8.14138.788+16
- 9.18878.707+2
- 10.669423.613+5
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
7
Download
736