That's obvious downside of obers (unlike LeIGs, for example).
Explains why so many players have stopped using them .
They all switched to riflemen.

Posts: 1705
That's obvious downside of obers (unlike LeIGs, for example).
Explains why so many players have stopped using them .

1 Posts: 2885
Nobody will expect M3´s or 222´s, 20mins to the game (Clearly AI knows something we dont)

Posts: 128

Posts: 33
Posts: 2819
STUG meta. Seriously, get one as soon as you can and sit it back from your infantry a bit. It pays dividends all game (I usually go for 2 now).
Just ignore OKW until they get rebalanced.
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1

Posts: 128
Posts: 1705
When I play Soviets and find out that Wehrmacht opponent invested into StuG(s) I feel relief. It means that I don't have to worry about AI vehicles any time soon and deal with those pesky StuGs later using SU-85, which just outrange them.
Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1
When I play Soviets and find out that Wehrmacht opponent invested into StuG(s) I feel relief. It means that I don't have to worry about AI vehicles any time soon and deal with those pesky StuGs later using SU-85, which just outrange them.

Posts: 33
When I play Soviets and find out that Wehrmacht opponent invested into StuG(s) I feel relief. It means that I don't have to worry about AI vehicles any time soon and deal with those pesky StuGs later using SU-85, which just outrange them.
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
Forcing you to build T4 is reward enough.
"invest" - a stug is 90 fuel. Teching to t4 for an su85 is much more of an investment
4 Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
1 Posts: 311

Posts: 128
hold out for panzerwerfer and ele or jt.
by "teams", i am assuming Arranged Teams?
Posts: 1218
|
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
33 | ||
|
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
13 | ||
|
|
|
11 | ||
|
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
5 |
cblanco ★
보드카 중대
VonManteuffel
Heartless Jäger