How to enhance USF early game options?

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 114

would love to hear some of your ideas on how to enhance early game options for the USF, I personally would have gone for indirect fire but i'm sure there are more creative ideas out there and i would like to discuss them. Only interested in talking about the early (and maybe mid) game, please no talk of jumbo Sherman or Pershing

Posts: 372

t0 mortar, and possibly buff Re's to be like 180 mp ostruppen.

Posts: 141

Other than T0 mortar this is one of my suggestions:

http://www.coh2.org/topic/36929/suggestion-rear-echelon-rework/page/2#post_id359210

Posts: 2561

1. Add T0 mortar for indirect for a conservative opening. (Should have fast setup time to keep in line with USF mobility)

2. Move WC51 Jeep from mechanized to T0 as well for a mobile aggressive start and scouting perposes. Also helps deal with snipers. (Replace with jeep related ability in mechanized)

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

Tone down rifles offensive power but make them cheaper (similar volks kinda), make rear echelons like osttrupen and sprinkle in some more weapon teams.

Posts: 278

I'd really like a t0 jeep, but I'd settle for a cheap mortar with smoke.

Posts: 1276

Give jeep, keep wc51 in doctrine. make nade package 15~ fuel.

The mortar is not what USF needs (we saw that in the alpha), it was a horrible unit and USF is already pretty hard with its mp needs.

Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1

Decrease the 50 cal dmg a little and move it to t0, and a cost decrease.

Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1

30 Jul 2015, 21:21 PMMittens

The mortar is not what USF needs (we saw that in the alpha), it was a horrible unit and USF is already pretty hard with its mp needs.

Really? I quite liked it. The Barrage sucked, but the smoke was a very useful addition to US early game. Did it need tweaks? yes. But it had potential.