MG 42 suppression reduction?
23 Jul 2015, 15:17 PM
#81
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedWhen will you guys learn? Proposing a nurf to an axis unit on this site just wont be accepted.
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
23 Jul 2015, 15:22 PM
#82
Posts: 738
Nice to see MG's buffed all round but only the MG42 is capable of being OP
Maybe we should nerf it to MG34 levels and have it shoot rubber bullets
Maybe we should nerf it to MG34 levels and have it shoot rubber bullets
23 Jul 2015, 18:32 PM
#83
Posts: 1486
If you make any tech building not 4 cons opening then OH outnumber you with mixed army thats kind of wrong.
 | Playercard of 2v2 imbecils | |||||||||||||||||||
|
SteamId is set to private for user id aaa. Set it to public if you want to link to your playercard via your user id.
23 Jul 2015, 22:06 PM
#84
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
looks like they removed instant supression of green cover. Its big deal.
May be it was a bug.
Nope, still suppressing single conscript squad on green cover at 5-6 burst at 15m and 10-11burst at 30m.
If 2 con squad, not sharing same cover but at a distance minor to 13m and all on green cover, the squad been shot at will get suppressed on 4-6 burst despite the range.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
23 Jul 2015, 22:38 PM
#85
Posts: 1486
Nope, still suppressing single conscript squad on green cover at 5-6 burst at 15m and 10-11burst at 30m.
If 2 con squad, not sharing same cover but at a distance minor to 13m and all on green cover, the squad been shot at will get suppressed on 4-6 burst despite the range.
At least for me I clearly saw 100 times that prev. patch units were getting supressed in 1 burst in 1 sec.
Their cover was irrelevant. Right now they stay under fire long enough to kill that mg if its in red cover.
| Playercard of 2v2 imbecils | |||||||||||||||||||
|
SteamId is set to private for user id aaa. Set it to public if you want to link to your playercard via your user id.
23 Jul 2015, 22:42 PM
#86
Posts: 1248
allll fineee jeezzz (seriously)
26 Jul 2015, 11:22 AM
#87
Posts: 1486
allll fineee jeezzz (seriously)
I dont think mg 42 is all fine.
It has 22 MP reinforcement cost. Thats why its "cost increase" is dust to the eyes. It must be standart 260/8 = 33 MP reinforcment cost.
| Playercard of 2v2 imbecils | |||||||||||||||||||
|
SteamId is set to private for user id aaa. Set it to public if you want to link to your playercard via your user id.
26 Jul 2015, 11:35 AM
#88
Posts: 1653
aaa nerf axis more and buff allies more perhaps your granny never learned you to be fair Kappa
26 Jul 2015, 13:09 PM
#89
Posts: 1486
standart reinforcemrnt cost for all units must be the same cost to buy/number of units.
So MG42 must cost 33 to reinforce.
So MG42 must cost 33 to reinforce.
| Playercard of 2v2 imbecils | |||||||||||||||||||
|
SteamId is set to private for user id aaa. Set it to public if you want to link to your playercard via your user id.
26 Jul 2015, 13:13 PM
#90
4 Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1
standart reinforcemrnt cost for all units must be the same cost to buy/number of units.
So MG42 must cost 33 to reinforce.
Actually, team weapons have a cost based off of their crewmembers and the cost of the weapon they crew. This is why the Maxim crewmembers cost 15 mp, even though the squad costs 240mp, which should make the Maxim crew 20mp each.
The increase in MG42 price with no increase in crewmember cost shows that the MG42 as a weapon is worth more mp, not the crew using it.
26 Jul 2015, 13:16 PM
#91
Posts: 1702
Actually, team weapons have a cost based off of their crewmembers and the cost of the weapon they crew. This is why the Maxim crewmembers cost 15 mp, even though the squad costs 240mp, which should make the Maxim crew 20mp each.
The increase in MG42 price with no increase in crewmember cost shows that the MG42 as a weapon is worth more mp, not the crew using it.
This makes absolutely no sense considering that 0.50 cal weapon teams cost 35 to reinforce and have 2 times less DPS than any other weapon crews in the game...
26 Jul 2015, 13:39 PM
#92
Posts: 1486
OH T1 units are mixing with each other too well for 0 cost of the building and early availability.
Its just not about single unit. Its about their mix. Why not move sniper to T2 or T3?
On urban maps where you open with T2 early sniper has no counters really. Let us skip T3 it will be end of all problems
Its just not about single unit. Its about their mix. Why not move sniper to T2 or T3?
On urban maps where you open with T2 early sniper has no counters really. Let us skip T3 it will be end of all problems
| Playercard of 2v2 imbecils | |||||||||||||||||||
|
SteamId is set to private for user id aaa. Set it to public if you want to link to your playercard via your user id.
26 Jul 2015, 13:43 PM
#93
4 Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1
This makes absolutely no sense considering that 0.50 cal weapon teams cost 35 to reinforce and have 2 times less DPS than any other weapon crews in the game...
Exactly, its an outlier. USF support weapons have really odd reinforce values (see pack howitzer), and that is part of the reason why USF support weapons seem terrible in relation to those of other factions.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.278110.716+16
- 2.270144.652+2
- 3.29446.865-1
- 4.558230.708+2
- 5.253150.628+14
- 6.968566.631-4
- 7.22491.711+11
- 8.8120.802-1
- 9.19078.709+4
- 10.399200.666+8
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
7
Download
780