Login

russian armor

WEHRMACHT=RUBBISH

  • This thread is locked
PAGES (15)down
10 Mar 2015, 23:50 PM
#101
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1



I dont understand.... pretty sure this has been brought up before......

I Make 8$ an Hour
You make 10$ an Hour
We both want a Hamburger Meal(MURICA) for 6$
It cost 6$ for both of us

P.S. Thanks for telling who that is in your signature, really cool/funny show!



uhhhhhh no its not fine care to explain how its fine to us?


But it will take me longer to get the 6 dollars for the burger?

Lets say for instance I make 66% of the money you make, for simplicity reasons I make 66 dollars you make 100, so that means for every dollar you make I make 66 cents.

If we want to buy something that's worth 1000 dollars, it will be worth 33% more to me because I will have to work 33% percent longer to make up the difference between you and me.



11 Mar 2015, 07:35 AM
#102
avatar of daspoulos

Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1

Permanently Banned


Grens with lmgs beat rifles in the long run, just keep grens alive, gain vet, hold your fuel point, upgrade lmgs, get a pak, consolidate power and smash usf with one blow late game

Much EZ, pees cake
11 Mar 2015, 08:08 AM
#103
avatar of FaustCostBulletin

Posts: 521

I compared stats for IS-2 and Tiger and I don't understand why the Tiger is clearly inferior for the same cost. A bit faster reload for Tiger but that's it. The rest is equal or worse.


Blitz vs Secure Mode.

Panzer Tactician vs nothing.

Panzerschreck vs PTRS.

Overall flimsier opponents vs most of heavyweights in the game as opponents

Asymmetrical balance. One of the few places where they got it right.
11 Mar 2015, 08:11 AM
#104
avatar of Aerohank

Posts: 2337 | Subs: 1



Lets say for instance I make 66% of the money you make, for simplicity reasons I make 66 dollars you make 100, so that means for every dollar you make I make 66 cents.

If we want to buy something that's worth 1000 dollars, it will be worth 33% more to me because I will have to work 33% percent longer to make up the difference between you and me.





You would have to work 50% longer to get the same amout of money as the other guy when you have 66.66% of his salary.
11 Mar 2015, 09:46 AM
#105
avatar of Specialka

Posts: 144



You would have to work 50% longer to get the same amout of money as the other guy when you have 66.66% of his salary.


And in the end, 1000$ stays 1000$ dollar, even if you have to wait longer to get it.
11 Mar 2015, 10:45 AM
#106
avatar of austerlitz

Posts: 1705

Wehr is fine


OKW is fine.
11 Mar 2015, 10:57 AM
#107
avatar of JohnnyB

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

Wehr is fine


Your bias is fine. I mean, nothing wrong with it, it's a good healthy bias.
11 Mar 2015, 11:01 AM
#108
avatar of QueenRatchet123

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned
Wehr is fine


TOP KEK

u trolling right?
11 Mar 2015, 12:55 PM
#109
avatar of ATCF
Donator 33

Posts: 587

C´mon Brummbar is a very good unit, it has the 33% stun chance from its rounds, making it kinda good AT, while being very good AI vehicle

( Even StephenJF killed 2 M10´s with a Brummbar back in the day :) )
11 Mar 2015, 15:35 PM
#110
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1



You would have to work 50% longer to get the same amout of money as the other guy when you have 66.66% of his salary.


If he's making 100 dollars and I'm making 66 he's making 33% more than I am. I just simplified it to using 66 and 100 for the sake of simplicity

If were both working towards the same goal, and I'm making 66% of whatever he is making then I'll need to work 33% longer to make up the difference. (that is it offset the difference in income).

And in the end, 1000$ stays 1000$ dollar, even if you have to wait longer to get it.


Yeah but it's worth more to you because you had to work longer to get it, and you won't be able to replace it as fast as the person who makes more. The reason OKW tanks cost just as much as every other factions is to make the more valuable for OKW (and to justify the Vet 5 bonus system).
11 Mar 2015, 15:52 PM
#111
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 13805 | Subs: 7

Someone here have an issue with the concept of point of view.

If you have 100 of something and another person have 66, then you have 33% more if you take your 100 as a base.

If you have 66 of something and another person have 100, then he have 50% more if you take your 66 as base.

In the end 66 is 66 and 100 is 100. Relation of one to another depends purely on the point of view you take when making comparison.

There, advanced math course for challenged done, Professor Katitof will grant you a certificate later.
11 Mar 2015, 15:54 PM
#112
avatar of AssaultPlazma

Posts: 300

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Mar 2015, 15:52 PMKatitof
Someone here have an issue with the concept of point of view.

If you have 100 of something and another person have 66, then you have 33% more if you take your 100 as a base.

If you have 66 of something and another person have 100, then he have 50% more if you take your 66 as base.

In the end 66 is 66 and 100 is 100. Relation of one to another depends purely on the point of view you take when making comparison.

There, advanced math course for challenged done, Professor Katitof will grant you a certificate later.


That last part was rather harsh..... But thank for explaining this in a more clearly I was trying to think of a way but was having trouble doing so in a easy manner.
11 Mar 2015, 15:58 PM
#113
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 13805 | Subs: 7

Didn't mean you for the last part Plazma :) As the Einstain(not sure) said, if you can't explain something simply, you just don't understand it well enough.

All that years of physics slowly pay off for me :D
11 Mar 2015, 16:10 PM
#114
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Mar 2015, 15:52 PMKatitof
Someone here have an issue with the concept of point of view.

If you have 100 of something and another person have 66, then you have 33% more if you take your 100 as a base.

If you have 66 of something and another person have 100, then he have 50% more if you take your 66 as base.

In the end 66 is 66 and 100 is 100. Relation of one to another depends purely on the point of view you take when making comparison.

There, advanced math course for challenged done, Professor Katitof will grant you a certificate later.


Everyone in the game has 100, OKW has 66. Thus we are looking at a point of view comparing 100 to 66.

66 isn't the base, OKW has 33% reduced fuel income from all sources except Luftwaffe supply drops.
11 Mar 2015, 16:12 PM
#115
avatar of TheSleep3r

Posts: 670



Everyone in the game has 100, OKW has 66. Thus we are looking at a point of view comparing 100 to 66.

66 isn't the base, OKW has 33% reduced fuel income from all sources except Luftwaffe supply drops.

it's funny when you assume anything you fail at explaining it

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Mar 2015, 15:58 PMKatitof
Didn't mean you for the last part Plazma :) As the Einstain(not sure) said, if you can't explain something simply, you just don't understand it well enough.

All that years of physics slowly pay off for me :D

Smiling Katitof lol

I like this part of prepatch euphoria
11 Mar 2015, 16:13 PM
#116
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

mmmmmm yes lets say 66 is the base, when only 1 faction in the game gets 33% reduced income.
11 Mar 2015, 16:16 PM
#117
avatar of TheSleep3r

Posts: 670

mmmmmm yes lets say 66 is the base, when only 1 faction in the game gets 33% reduced income.

this is simply wrong, u dont assume anything based on "we have majority of factions with this and minority with this"

I cant believe Im doing this but
11 Mar 2015, 16:26 PM
#118
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

He said that if you have 100 and someone else has 66 then you have 33% more, and considering every faction in the game except OKW get's 100 and OKW gets 66, OKW has 66% less than everyone else.

I mean you can argue that everyone has 50% more than OKW, but then you would be an idiot because Relic themselves had said OKW get's 33% reduced fuel income compared to the other factions.
11 Mar 2015, 16:36 PM
#119
avatar of TheSleep3r

Posts: 670

He said that if you have 100 and someone else has 66 then you have 33% more, and considering every faction in the game except OKW get's 100 and OKW gets 66, OKW has 66% less than everyone else.

I mean you can argue that everyone has 50% more than OKW, but then you would be an idiot because Relic themselves had said OKW get's 33% reduced fuel income compared to the other factions.


You know, I had a grandfather once in times of my youth. He used to smoke very much, and my mother told him: 'stop smoking or else you won't see your grandchild adult'. He got extremely scared and stopped smoking immediately.

He died when I was 17.

My mother told me then that I can't smoke cigarettes, not after death of my grandfather, not ever. I was listening her my whole life.

I interrnally regret doing it so much right now. Because your post gave me cancer anyway
11 Mar 2015, 16:39 PM
#120
avatar of AssaultPlazma

Posts: 300

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Mar 2015, 15:58 PMKatitof
Didn't mean you for the last part Plazma :) As the Einstain(not sure) said, if you can't explain something simply, you just don't understand it well enough.

All that years of physics slowly pay off for me :D


No I know it wasnt aimed at me(still a bit harsh though)
PAGES (15)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • Oberkommando West flag N1cko
  • Oberkommando West flag Scotch1
  • Soviets flag Frosty
  • Soviets flag Beatricks Swire
uploaded by Frost

Board Info

136 users are online: 8 members and 128 guests
blvckdream, Crecer13, Woldense10, Rigwaz, Sturmpanther, Osinyagov, serg_codmod, SneakEye
163 posts in the last 24h
1128 posts in the last week
4954 posts in the last month
Registered members: 69473
Welcome our newest member, Woldense10
Most online: 918 users on 27 Oct 2019, 01:03 AM